Crawford or Lomachenko?

Crawfords the better fighter. Salido said Loma has no left hand and that's he's all righthsnd everything.

 

You say it because you like to lie lmfao... And I wouldn't give a **** if he lost almost every round to anyone as long as he gets dat dub.

 

But in pure boxing, Loma's better. I don't see anyone at 130 being able to outbox him.

 

Crawford better fighter, more accomplished.

Loma on his way, both will be hofs

 

Lol

 

Loma took less time to be a 2 weight champion than Crawford.

 

He has no left hand. None, and it won't hurt or be effective against any top notch fighter.

 

Bu bu bu by by but he lost faster lol

 

Top notch? You mean like Walters, Russell Jr, and Martinez?

 

No left hand, no problem

This content is protected

 

[QUOTE="BlizzyBlizz, post: 18404185, member:
How Loma started out has no bearing on anything that we are talking about because he still lost to Salido.[/QUOTE]

Only a cretin would think this.

But then again that is exactly what you are.

 

Martinez? Lol. No Salido lol

 

Only a cretin would think this.

But then again that is exactly what you are.[/QUOTE]
Yeah but you the degenerate goes the opposite way only Salido is a cavity I mean thorn in your side lol.

 

They can't seem to get their tiny brains around this.

Plus as ive already said Crawfords top 3 wins are a small Gamboa, Postol and Ricky Burns....hardly HOF material.

 

Yeah but you the degenerate goes the opposite way only Salido is a cavity I mean thorn in your side lol.[/QUOTE]

Thats not even funny or witty.