You're making a case based off what it says on boxrec. Im telling you and showing you what happened in the ring. You obviously never watched any of the 3 fights. This content is protected This content is protected Foreman said all he was doing as holding all night. Lederman was calling for him to be disqualified SAMUEL_PETER: This content is protected Fact - Wladwent life and death with Peter. Helenius destroyed him and looked great doing it. Wlad looked utter garbage.. You and your other alt - AliMyths&Ledgends are here only to promote Klitschko since the HW Blog was deleted. You serve no other purpose. You dksab.
And the second fight was even a worse illegal clinch fest. Even his own supporters in Germany started booing him which is unheard of from a German audience. That tells you how bad it was. http://www.boxingnews24.com/2010/09/steward-was-telling-wladimir-to-stop-clinching-peter/ Without illegal holding Peter would have knocked him out twice. Eddie Chambers didn't need any clinching to out box Peter and he wouldn't have been able to even if he wanted since his was a 6 foot puffed up cruiser weight. Robert Helenius exposed Wlad overrated skills something fierce. Both him , Toney , Chambers and Vitali all handled Peter a lot easier. Only Wlad went life and death. Even MaCline who was out of shape having took the fight on short notice almost had Peter gone within two rounds. Peter would not have been remotely competitive with an in shape prime MaCline.
I say that YDKSAB since Peter beat Toney twice and Wlad beat Peter twice. I say that you are a delusional ass that makes up his own "facts" and alternate reality as he goes along. I say that you're a liar and a fraud and that no matter the facts, you will always invent better ones. Only in an alternate universe does a guy who lost twice do better than somebody that won twice. Welcome to the Dinoverse, one and all, where cause and effect have no relationship. Dino has a special affinity for losers, which is why he tries to reconfigure events to suit his own buckled view.
I wouldn't believe anything Haye says. He is getting it out there in case Joshua wins and then Haye will try and claim it doesn't mean much as Vlad looked awful beforehand.
Edited hours later so I wouldn't reply? Yeah, It doesn't mean anything, but It shows how idiotic your triangle theories are.
Considering Helenius is a shot never was that would be a terrible look for Wlad if true. I however, don't believe for a second that the Nordic Nightmare is giving Wlad many problems.
No. It would be marked as edited if i did that. Your comparison was stupid anyway. Mercer fought Wlad 6 years after Lewis. Peter fought Helenius 7 MONTHS after Wlad.
And 6 years after Wlad really struggled with Peter, and 20 lbs overweight. And It was still a competitive fight until Peter got caught with the big right.
You haven't a rebuttal to a single sentence i posted. Own me?? Im still waiting. Is that one liner the best you have to offer? I don't want a response to this post. Go respond to the last two posts you completely ignored.
It wasn't competitive in the slightest. Helenus flattened him with a left hook , Peter got up and got knocked dead with another left hook. There was NO right hand. Go join Jim Dean in the waste paper basket of posters.
It was competitive you dip****. You've never seen that fight, just looked up the KO footage on youtube. ****ing casual.
It've seen the fight live, I'm not going off by some 30 seconds KO footage like you ****ing imbecile. Peter was grossly overweight and the fight was still competitive. Deal with it.
nor do i saw wlad light footed v miller / miller finding it hard to land with anything. while i watched helnius v dulhaupus and while helnius is a very big man / he is a plodder / his shots slow and methodical and he got kod badly by a man who does not have any power while allowing himself to be bullied around the ring. does not add up haye`s accounts.