Would sugar ray Robinson be regarded as the or one of the greatest if he had fought in recent times?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Fergy, Mar 2, 2017.


  1. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,369
    35,862
    Jan 8, 2017
    Robinson is quite rightly regarded as a ATG. Was that a product of the time s he fought in or would that stand today. If for example he had won the title back in say 1990 and then lost it 4 times before regaining would he still have that aura of greatness bestowed up on him? Was it his long undefeated record before he lost to jake part of that? Was it regaining the title s numerous times that. Makes him great,? If so would that make him still regarded as a great if he had fought in recent years? Or was it because no one had seen any thing like him up to the 50s with his skills and flamboyant personality,? This is certainly not a criticism of sugar, I'm a massive fan but just a query as to if he was a marvel because of the era he fought in and would he be looked at as the same if had fought in more modern times?
     
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,820
    21,405
    Sep 15, 2009
    If Thurman unifies the division, jumps up to MW and unifies there before fighting the undisputed champion at LHW, being ahead after 10 rounds but retiring on his stool before retiring, would he be seen as the best of all time?

    It's a good question. People fought much more back then so we're able to fight better opponents consistently. Plus fights between different weight classes occured much more often.

    Although by this point Thurman would have had to have already beaten the likes of Garcia and Crawford.

    That being said Floyd is a modern fighter and is considered one of these best ever, so who knows.
     
    joe brown and Fergy like this.
  3. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,369
    35,862
    Jan 8, 2017
    Good answer and kind of got down what I meant. If he had been around today there would obviously been more titles to go for so sugar winning back the official one several times is a great achievement. But I don't think he would have been given the same respect as has if fighting today. He would probably have been criticised for losing the title s several times rather than been that good to regain them. He would have still been called a great fighter I believe but the fact that he came along in the times he did, people had never seen a middle weight that skilful and charismatic. That went along with cementing that in to people s minds how great a fighter he was. But I just feel he would nt be looked at quite the same way in today's world. This is not a knock on sugar s great achievement s but how I feel he would be perceived now.
     
  4. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,369
    35,862
    Jan 8, 2017
    You mentioned Floyd and that s true , he is called a great fighter by most but he does have so many critics and that's with a unbeaten record. This is partly the reason I feel sugar wouldn't be as admired as he was. U would have negative criticism that he lost to so and so fighter or he could only draw with so and so, it would be seen as more a negative rather than well he was good enough to win the title s back. Today s society would nt recognise him for the talent he was like they did back then. Different times.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,718
    29,052
    Jun 2, 2006
    Its an interesting question.
    Robinson lost to Jake in 46?He was a welter and Jake a middle,Ray then went until 51 before he lost again, to Turpin,his run and the men he was beating cemented his standing imo,plus unlike some, he was a risk taker he went for the ko.
    He was exciting to watch, excellent boxer,explosive puncher ,a dynamic personality, past- prime he played pass the parcel with the 160lbs crown but regained it multiple times .Yes I think he would be regarded as an ATG today one of the absolute best.
    The HD colour film ,and big screen TV's would enhance Rays rep today,imo
    The greatest of them all? That's perhaps another question that can only be answered by each individual.
     
  6. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,369
    35,862
    Jan 8, 2017
    Thank s for the answer mcvey. Can see all the points u made, I hope if he was fighting today or had done in more recent years he would get the respect he deserved. When I think of Roy Jones, how highly he was thought of in his prime, and then after tarver the negative comments on his later years, it kind of appears to me nowadays if your not unbeaten your legacy is diminished some how. Which is wrong. It's very much the may weather syndrome. And that's why I asked the question about sugar. He was a great legendary fighter and justly so but would today he be looked at differently for the losses he suffered. But glad to see your perspective on it and would hope so.
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,820
    21,405
    Sep 15, 2009
    See I rank Jones number 3 ATG I refuse to hold last prime losses against anyone.

    Whittaker is number 2 on my list and he did similar in that he unified LW, went up and beat the WW champion and then even beat the LMW man.

    I think what helps Robinson is how good he looks beating down LaMotta for that MW belt though.
     
    mcvey and Fergy like this.
  8. Mortal

    Mortal Member Full Member

    366
    194
    Sep 30, 2016
    He wouldn't have as many fights or fight as many hall of fame fighters than he did that's for sure. Ray fought something like 12 hall of fame inductees, some of them multiple times.

    Jake LaMotta 6 times
    Gene Fullmer 3 times
    Carmen Basilio 2 times
    Randy Turpin 2 times
    Fritzie Zivic 2 times
    Sammy Angott 3 times
    Kid Gavilan 2 times
    Henry Armstrong 1 time
    Bobo Olson 4 times
    Joey Maxim 1 time
    Rocky Graziano 1 time
    Joey Giardello 1 time

    Now that's 12 Hall of fame inductees, a total of 28 fights.

    In this era he wouldnt have no where near as many great names on his resume but he would have multiple titles and probably a zero on the end of his record.
     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2017
  9. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,369
    35,862
    Jan 8, 2017
    Certainly shouldn't be held against a fighter, totally agree with that. And it's not in prime losses that counts, its the way u come back from them. And sugar was one of the best for that.
     
  10. juppity

    juppity Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,342
    4,348
    Dec 28, 2016
    There is no way a fighter like Floyd Mayweather would have be underfeated or lasted if he fought in
    SRR era. They fought so often and FM brittle hands would have hampered him. SRR would have been
    a star in any era and when young would have been like a Sugar Ray Leonard. His natural tendency
    to trade punches would mean when he would be involved in some thrilling battles with fighters
    who could have outboxed if more disciplined . Unlike Jones Jr who was more safety conscious.
    As he aged and reflexes and natural advantages slowed he would be more vulnerable and career
    would end up with a couple of late losses. SRR would be remembered as ATG but not the
    greatest.
     
    Fergy and joe brown like this.
  11. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,363
    1,782
    Sep 9, 2011
    say he starts at lw 20 years ago, mostly as a ww, and was retiring at mw today with 50 fights. lots of great and very good fighters to prove himself against.

    obviously he loses the huge streak, and that is a part of his greatness.
     
  12. Momus

    Momus Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,732
    2,571
    Nov 27, 2010
    If you want to draw parallels with modern times, his career would probably end up looking like a combination of Roy Jones and Bernard Hopkins. The first part of his career would be stockpiling titles across multiple weight divisions, widespread recognition as mythical p4p king, but without perhaps the volume of career defining fights needed to satisfy everyone. The latter part would see both wins and losses against younger world class opposition, with his post-prime wins giving him increasingly more recognition as an ATG.

    It can be argued that it’s harder for fighters to demonstrate greatness in the modern era, but the truly exceptional fighters still get there. Some accomplishments would be virtually impossible to replicate though, such as walking around with a 128-1-2 record, or winning 5 of 6 against a Hall of Famer outweighing him by (normally) 10-15 lbs.
     
    juppity and joe brown like this.
  13. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,282
    11,649
    Mar 19, 2012
    Sugar Ray would have so many titles it wouldn't even be funny. He had two undefeated runs in his prime. From about `40 to `43 when he first lost to Jake LaMotta [giving away weight] and then all the way to `51 when Turpin beat him. So that`s 11 years of dominance. He then started to lose and win the title back and forth. He lost the middleweight title 3 times in the ring.
     
  14. Radrook

    Radrook Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,923
    917
    Feb 24, 2017
    Many fighters lose fights after continuing to fight past their prime and are still considered great.

    Examples:
    1. Duran
    2. Ali
    3. Chaves Sr
    4. Ray Leonard
    5. Joe Louis
    6. Jack Dempsey
     
    mcvey likes this.
  15. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,100
    8,532
    Jul 17, 2009
    Would no doubt be a top contender for number one,pound for pound,in any era that he would have come along in.