True or False: Keith Thurman belings HIGHER on p4p list then GGG?

Porter was undefeated?
Check again.

 

Thurman ranks higher without a doubt...

 

OP is an idiot. Easily one of the worst posters on here. Why come?

 

GGG for me. More active and has been champ longer in his weight class.

 

Higher definitely. Thurman has a great CV now.

 

Garcia certainly is significantly better than any of Golovkins' wins on an individual level. Porter very well could be too. It's a conversation now as an argument of some quality could be made either way. Does Golovkins' quantity triumph Thurman's top wins? I'd say so, but it's closer than most 9G fanboys would now like to say. With a decisive win over Jacobs, which would be by far his greatest victory, Golovkin will easily put this argument to rest.

 

True, without a shadow of a doubt.

 

Resume determines who's higher ranked imo. Thurman just enhanced his resume with his close win over Garcia.

 

Very true

 

He should be on the P4P list now. I'd say he's higher than Golovkin (I place Golovkin 9th). Thurman probably takes 9th, Golovkin taking 10th.

BUT Golovkin is going to go higher once he beats Jacobs.

 

GGG is my top p4p fighter, spence hangs with him but I don't have anyone on their levels.
Thurman probably is in my bottom half of my top 10, so NO WAY is Thurman close to ggg. Thurman has a pretty strong argument for being the current #3 ww, of course Spence and brook are 1/2 then quite a few levels trailing them could be thurman

 

Danny has a better resume than Spence. Danny is a better P4P fighter than Spence.

Right?

 

DSG has been exposed before, he's good, but also hadn't beaten anyone of worth at 147. Thurman was also the favorite. Good win, but nothing sensational about it. Thurman moves up a spot or 2.