Joseph Parker vs Hughie Fury who wins & why?

KO KO KO

Parker wins

 

Come man, your playing games. Do you think @Lith was unaware that this is my personal opinion, is there such things as an objective ranking? You could point respected bodies but there is no such thing as objectivity when it comes to ranking. The only thing objective in boxing someone can point to is the stats and historical events e.g. a fighter's wins, losses, ko percentage, rounds fought etc.

What you doing is trying to be pedantic to useless level lol.

 

No need to resort to insults as it suggests you are frusterated. Also changing the subject is another sign of frusteration and defeat. I have not changed the subject or resorted to insults as its a defeated response. If you want, just read our traded posts, you'll see that Im right.

 

Whats Lith got to do with it? To think Lith has anything to do with it is on the wrong track.

 

Read that above. This is not fact. You even admitted this was your opinion as I will later prove. My response is basically saying that this is not fact but your opinion. Look at my response below...

Now here is my proof that it was just your opinion...

To which I said...

It does sound like its fact but its your??? Have a guess???...thats right your personal opinion. That can be misleading as its presented as if factual. Thats all I was saying Have a look again...

 

Nah I didnt insult you, did I? I said your being very picky to a useless level, not sure that would be considered an insult but if you felt like I did I apologise.

 

This was a response to @Lith, how could it have nothing to do with him looool.

 

Lool I clarified that it was my personal opinion when you called me up on it. However you are missing my point, all ranking talk is subjective noone could make a objective ranking statement, its bizarre that you don't understand that.

Its like me saying blue is better than black, I don't have to notify that it is my opinion because there is no way to verify if blue is in fact better than black it is an and will always be an opinion regardless if I thought it was a fact or not.

 

After reading our traded posts and understanding our subject matter, you should know Lith has really nothing to do with this. I think you skim read some posts and thats a bad habit especially in forums.

 

If Parker has been working hard on his stamina, can cut the ring and stay on Hughie then the fight will be an easy parker TKO or UD. But from what i've seen if Parker starts to gas then I could see Hughie picking at him from range as Parker just tries to shuffle forward. So I'm expecting a solid first 4-5 rounds to Parker, then the fight evening out as Parker slows down. So I guess my decision will be maybe Parker SD/UD 7 rounds to 5 or so. With him slowing down around round 5, taking rounds slow and then coming back around the 9th-10th round strong.

 

Ohhh I got tagged, I didn't know you could do that. How exciting!

In other news, dammit the original announced fight date is only just over 2 weeks away - May 6th feels far too far away... I really want to see this fight.

Will be very interesting, this will probably be the most rested and recovered Parker that there has been before a fight.

 

Its not being picky, its about posting so that everytime you post, people know where your coming from. Look how I present undeniable proof. People say 'oh youre wrong' but they got no proof lol. In our traded posts, I have provided proof by bringing up your posts your words, not mine. Maybe you werent trying to insult but just like your sentence were discussing, look at how the bottom post can be misinterpreted as insulting...

Im not trying to be pendantic, Im just trying to set the record straight.

 

I don't even know what your talking about anymore lol.

I'm sorry I didn't point out that every subjective statement I make is my opinion loool, I hope that solves the problem my good man.

 

All I was saying is that is was your opinion and not a fact and in your wording, it makes it out to be fact. I have all the undeniable proof. That was all.

 

If I find something you say as pendantic to useless level, why is that insulting I'm not saying you are useless.

Undeniable proof about what? That I presented inherently subjective statement as a fact, it's not my fault if people can not discern that something's are not verifiable objectively. If you felt it was not true, you could made a statement of where he ranks instead. I couldn't disprove your statement just as much as you couldn't disprove mine.