Why do people think Wladimir Klitschko ducked Sanders, Purrity rematch? It was the other way round.

It's not my fault if you can't come up with any new questions or accusations that are not already addressed in post #83.

 

I don't know who Mongoose is, but I'm sure he would agree that everything you asked and demanded has already been explored in depth in post#83

If you don't like being refereed to post #83, quit asking questions that have already been answered in post #83.

 

What it proves is:

1) Sanders' "voluntary" had been turned into a mandatory by the WBO
2) Brewster was next in line for the mandatory, NOT Wladimir
3) Wladimir forcing a rematch means that Sanders would be stripped and the rematch would be for no belt

the rest of post #83 shows that:

4) Sanders himself decided not to fight Brewster but fight Vitali instead.
5) Wlad wanted his belt back more than he wanted to fight Sanders.

There's no "ducking" going on by any of the parties, who all have reasonable explanations for their behaviour. Certainly Sanders, fighting the tougher brother over the one he had just demolished, was not chickening out of anything.

 

Mongoose was a quality poster. You should read some of his stuff. He was the guy that annihilated Dino on a ban bet that Dino never honoured.

 

Lol!! Fat body.. do you really want me to start pointing out all the grammatical errors you plaster up here in these forums??

You are no doubt in the top 5 dumbest posters in these threads. ****ing idiot that's over 40 years old busting out with 2nd grade insults. Lol!

I hope you slip on a banana peel you forgot to pick up and crack your head open

Lol!

 

if you lose to a contender you are expcted as champ to rematch and beat him.

if you lose easily in seconds when prime to a retired no hoper...first up you arent much h2h if that happens even ONCE.... imagine being so weak h2h that you'd get starched out TWICE. People would see you for what you are , a paper champ. Better to run than risk that kind of career destorying exposure - that way you can have damage limitation of the fight being debated as a one in a million loss rather than as stark evidence of your paucity in ability.

 

Seems to me that the winner was Post #83.

 

Did Wlad trigger his rematch clause?

Did Wlad seek out a rematch?

When did Wlad force the rematch?? WHEN?? Show me ??

 

I just quoted post 83..

Post 83 proves Wlad did not trigger his rematch option. Where in this post does it say Sanders
A. Refused a rematch
B. Wlad demanded his rematch

WHERE?????????????????????

 

Mongoose was a POS who got perma-banned off this forum for good reason.

Why didn't Wlad rematch Sanders?

 

WBA heavyweight champion David Haye could still face either of the Klitschkos this summer, the brothers' manager Bernd Boente has revealed.

After protracted negotiations, Haye and IBF and WBO champion Wladimir have agreed to a fight on 25 June or 2 July

It has been widely assumed that Haye will face Wladimir in a German football stadium on either 25 June or 2 July, but Boente said: "In the talks, David was not rejecting Vitali any more, he was very flexible.

Haye told Sky Sports News that the contract he has signed does allow for Vitali to stand in for his younger brother if Wladimir suffers some form of injury - as he has pulled out of two fights with Dereck Chisora in recent months.

There you have it Goose . Haye couldn't fight Wlad unless he agreed to Vitali. Now we know exactly why Wlad didn't fight Sanders. He banked on Vitali to do the job for him and history proves exactly THAT.

Even David Price had the gonads to rematch a shot old man and he only had 16 fights under his belt. Wlad had FORTY

 

Where does it say he was ordered to rematch Wlad?
How was he the WBO champ if he was stripped?

 

The unemployed, uncivilized caveman has spoketh lmao.

 

How could he force a rematch when Sanders had a mandatory?

Read post 83, it's all there.

 

Mongoose whipped your arse Texas - style