Why do people think Wladimir Klitschko ducked Sanders, Purrity rematch? It was the other way round.

1) This contract has clause X in it
2) Fighter Y agreed to clause X
3) Dinologic ...
...
...
4) Therefore Fighter Z also agreed to clause X!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tah-daaaah!

 

Brewster became mandatory after Wlad passed on the fight. Passing on the rematch made Sanders free to try make a big money fight with Roy Jones. Both the Jones and Brewster fights were options for Sanders because Wlad did exactly as his handlers stated in post 83 and sought tune-up fights.

I'll answer any question you have , but you cannot answer any of mine. Got any more?

Why did Wlad not force the rematch?

 

More fun facts to add to post #83 as the definitive Klistchko/Sanders rematch post

Sanders was injured in 2003 as it turns out and out of training. And here he is once more stating stating his intentions.

[url]http://www.secondsout.com/world-boxing-news/world-boxing-news/sanders-wants-both-klitschkos-then-retire[/url]

I stayed away from the gym at first but I soon got back into training,” said Sanders. “Money was the motivation and the chance to make millions. My goal is to win the title from Vitali, defend against Wladimir for big money and then retire to be honest.

“This is payback time for me. Money plays a big part but I also want to be the WBC heavyweight champion and a three time champion. I know the WBU and WBO titles are not the best titles to have but the WBC is the most prestigious and I’m very grateful for the opportunity.

Midway through 2003, Sanders, 39-2-(29), badly cut his right hand on a sliding glass door but insists that injury has now fully healed.

“The hand is now fine, perfect,” said Sanders. “I’m in the gym and training normally.”

 

A. If it's not in post #83 then it didn't happen.
B. Post #83.

 

Provide a source where Wlad actually says he doesn't want the fight. Not talking about post #83 which clearly states Sanders was allowed a voluntary defense before being obligated to face Wladimir.

post #83

 

why would anyone say they didnt want a fight that they are expected to take or be total flop not to?

 

Oh my, seems this Mongoose guy has already educated Dino 2 years ago on the same subject. What a sad man this Dino is.

I love this exchange, it's beautiful. This Mongoose apparently owned all these idiots.

[url]https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/klitschko-has-only-defended-the-hw-title-twice.532967/page-22[/url]


[url]https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/klitschko-has-only-defended-the-hw-title-twice.532967/page-23[/url]

 

Then you must prove Klitschko was lying. What about this sentence confuses you and Dino so much? Can you read English at a 3rd grade level? Post #83 states Klitschko/Sanders 2 was expected by the end of 2003, and now it turns out Sanders was out with injury the last half of the year.


Corrie Sanders will be allowed one voluntary defence of the WBO heavyweight title he so easily wrenched from Wladimir Klitschko’s grasp before he is contractually obligated to fight the 1996 Olympic champion once again

 

post #83 has been updated with Sanders' hand injury and yet another quote where he states he wants Vitali before Wlad.

But I think the real problem some people have is...this sentence. It seems to confuse the weaker minds.

"Corrie Sanders will be allowed one voluntary defence of the WBO heavyweight title he so easily wrenched from Wladimir Klitschko’s grasp before he is contractually obligated to fight the 1996 Olympic champion once again "

 

OH no...

[url]http://www.secondsout.com/archive/anthony-evans/q--a-with-corrie-sanders[/url]

: Before the Jones thing came up it appeared you were heading into a December rematch with Wladimir, providing you both won your interim bouts? How do you see the rematch with Klitschko?

CS: I have a step up on him, mentally. I know he'll fight very differently the second time around. He'll be probably be a completely different fighter with a completely different approach in this fight. But the truth is he can't take my punches and, even if it takes until round seven or eight, I'll land and get to him again. I think next year is my last in boxing.

I'm so happy I've finally fought and beaten a top, top name in my career and even if I get a good hiding in these next three fights (the Klitschko win) will be something I can always be proud of. Then I'll just enjoy myself on my hunting farm and be happy with what I've done in boxing.

 

LOL!!



Looks like Post 205 is the new Post 83

 

Well, I was going to come back and post more stuff, but it seems Mong ... um, Cobra has posted more and better stuff than I found. I think it's goodnight for HerolDino about now.

We musn't forget to bookmark this thread.

In three months Dino will have forgotten about it and restart the same tedious process

 

Remember...i made up the December Sanders/Klitscho rematch claim and ran when Dino demanded evidence..

This is like the third damn article it's mentioned.

And it appears the Sanders/Jones circus was the cause of it not happening.

I would also like to find more on this Sanders' injury that apparently was kept on the down low and had him out of training for all of 2003.

 

"Danell Nicholson is exactly the kind of opponent that Wladimir currently needs, promoter Klaus-Peter Kohl said."

Any more questions? Don't be afraid to ask. I won't duck and deflect my way out of it like you.

 

You can't rewrite history.

Why did Wlad take a fight with Moli instead of rematching Sanders? Why did he fight Nicholson instead of rematching Sanders

Everybody watch as Goose worms his way out of this very simple question..