Post your Golovkin-Jacobs round by round scorecard

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Bogotazo, Mar 18, 2017.


  1. Mod-Mania

    Mod-Mania Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,651
    2,852
    Aug 12, 2012
    Round 1 GGG 10-9
    Round 2 Jacobs 10-9
    Round 3 Jacobs 10-9
    Round 4 GGG 10-8
    Round 5 GGG 10-9
    Round 6 Jacobs 10-9
    Round 7 Jacobs 10-9
    Round 8 Jacobs 10-9
    Round 9 GGG 10-9
    Round 10 GGG 10-9
    Round 11 Jacobs 10-9
    Round 12 Jacobs 10-9

    114-113 Jacobs.
     
  2. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,817
    2,960
    Dec 11, 2009
    Round 1 Even 10/10
    Round 2 Jacobs 10/9
    Round 3 Jacobs 10/9
    Round 4 Golovkin 10/8
    Round 5 Golovkin 10/9
    Round 6 Jacobs 10/9
    Round 7 Jacobs 10/9
    Round 8 Golovkin 10/9
    Round 9 Golovkin 10/9
    Round 10 Jacobs 10/9
    Round 11 Jacobs 10/9
    Round 12 Jacobs 10/9

    115/113 Jacobs
    Will watch it again as there were some close rounds
     
  3. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,302
    78,560
    Nov 30, 2006
    The first three and the eleventh seem to be universally agreed upon Jacobs rounds outside your card, so if you shift those his way you actually have it comfortably for him.
     
    pacas likes this.
  4. Glassbrain

    Glassbrain Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,590
    1,367
    Apr 9, 2016
    Round 1 Jacobs 10-9
    Round 2 Jacobs 10-9
    Round 3 Jacobs 10-9
    Round 4 GGG 10-8
    Round 5 GGG 10-9
    Round 6 Jacobs 10-9
    Round 7 Jacobs 10-9
    Round 8 GGG 10-9
    Round 9 GGG 10-9
    Round 10 Jacobs 10-9
    Round 11 Jacobs 10-9
    Round 12 Jacobs 10-9

    115-112 Jacobs
     
  5. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,817
    2,960
    Dec 11, 2009
    Except for me scoring the first round even, I have the same scorecard as you
     
  6. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,752
    16,912
    Apr 26, 2006
  7. NaiKoN

    NaiKoN M Power! Full Member

    820
    406
    Apr 28, 2013
    I don't understand for what are you giving the first two rounds for Jacobs? I have rewatched the fight and Jacobs hasn't done anything in there and GGG has landed a lot more shots including good jabs. So what is the reason for giving first two rounds for Jacobs?
     
    shanahan14, Jimako and heerko koois like this.
  8. tdf1974

    tdf1974 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,998
    2,165
    Sep 9, 2013
    exactly this for me...could maybe argue rd1 ....
     
  9. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,128
    Oct 17, 2009
    I think GGG relied too much on boxing ability, but given that Jacobs survived his power he didn't really have much of a choice. This article is a good look at Golovkin's decline in skilled boxing.

    http://www.badlefthook.com/2014/10/...echnique-stevens-rosado-geale-gif-analysis-ko
     
  10. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,227
    3,604
    Feb 20, 2008


    LOL. Stevie Wonder could score it better than this.
     
    CST80 likes this.
  11. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    37,903
    7,497
    Sep 2, 2011
    I don't remember RBR but I scored first round for GGG, next 2 for Jacobs and last for GGG. Those I think are the more debatable.
     
  12. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    28,158
    34,425
    Jul 24, 2004
    GGG won the 3rd, 4th and 12th. That's it. Otherwise, Jacobs controlled the fight utterly and completely.
    GGG landed maybe 6-8 jabs (and was effective when he did so), landed practically NONE of his vaunted body shots,
    and followed Jacobs around the ring like a lost little puppy dog all night.

    Jacobs has shown the blueprint for defeating GGG. Add a little power and even the GGG nut-huggers would be
    able to see it.

    BYW pre-fight I had GGG winning by KO.
     
    pacas and dinovelvet like this.
  13. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,684
    Sep 8, 2010
    Hahaha

    Just too funny. We lose the P4P King in controversy and Golovkins' fanboy fantasy-like reputation takes a massive hit all in back to back fights on the same card. That was the card this year to be in attendance and keep the ticket stub forever. And to think how much HBO and fans had put into Golovkin and Roman together...
     
    pacas likes this.
  14. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,250
    8,473
    Oct 8, 2013
    Round 1 Jacobs
    Round 2 Ggg
    Round 3 ggg
    Round 4 ggg (10-8)
    Round 5 ggg
    Round 6 Jacobs
    Round 7 Jacobs
    Round 8 Jacobs (close)
    Round 9 Ggg (close, critical round because I had Jacobs up until last 45 seconds when first of two good uppercuts land for ggg followed by hard Jab that clearly has Jacobs stunned)
    Round 10 Jacobs
    Round 11 Jacobs (close Jacobs looks tired and his punches are much more sloppy but I gave him round for flurry right at bell where he landed good punch)
    Round 12 ggg. Initiated the action landed the cleaner shots

    GGG 114-113
    Last time I watched it I had it 115-112 ggg

    Bottom line this was a close quality match
     
    shanahan14 likes this.
  15. KiwiMan

    KiwiMan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,399
    14,574
    Feb 28, 2016
    Re-scoring since it was 4 am in the morning for me and I was tired:

    Round 1. GGG 10-9 close. Jacobs landed one combination around the 2 minute mark, as well as a few other nice shots, but GGG just landed too many jabs not to give him this round.

    Round 2. Jacobs 10-9 very close. Very, very close round. Golovkin landed more jabs, Jacobs landed a few nice counterpunches. Am giving it to Jacobs because those counter-punches were cleaner than any of Golovkin's power punches, but it would not be unfair to score it for Golovkin or even.

    Round 3. Jacobs 10-9 very close. Another very close round. Golovkin won the first half of the round easily, Jacobs came back strong in the last minute with some nice shots. Once again it would not be unfair to score it for Golovkin or even.

    Round 4. GGG 10-8. Clear Golovkin round with a knockdown, Jacobs recovered well but obviously lost the round.

    Round 5. GGG 10-9. A clear Golovkin round, Jacobs a bit cautious at the start of the round after the knockdown in the previous round.

    Round 6. Jacobs 10-9. First half of the round Jacobs uses excellent movement to evade GGG while scoring with some light punches. In the second half of the round Jacobs lands several good combinations while GGG only has a few good shots here and there.

    Halfway score: GGG 57-56 Jacobs

    Round 7. Jacobs 10-9 close. Slow start to the round, Jacobs not landing much but GGG even less. At about 1:40 GGG corners Jacobs and landed a few power punches, which Jacobs takes very well. Jacobs responds well with his own combination at 1:30. It's a close round, giving it to Jacobs as he did more work.

    Round 8. GGG 10-9 close. Another close round, Jacobs having his moments but overall GGG landed the more telling blows in this round.

    Round 9. GGG 10-9 close. Jacobs starts with a good couple of left hooks. He is edging the round, until he gets caught and buzzed a little in the last 30 seconds and GGG takes the round.

    Round 10. Jacobs 10-9. Good round with more action than some of the others. Jacobs' boxing and moving is working well, despite GGG having his moments it's a Jacobs round.

    Round 11. Jacobs 10-9. Similarly to the previous round, Jacobs' movement is allowing him to edge the round. He gets the better of the best exchange of the round.

    Round 12. GGG 10-9. GGG starts well, lands a jab. Scrappy fighting up close with neither doing much better than the other. Around 2:00-1:50 GGG lands several nice single shots. Jacobs with a couple of nice shots around 1:15-1:00. Golovkin with a 1-2 at 0:20. It's Golovkin round overall, he outlands Jacobs in this round.

    Final score: GGG 114-113. Had it by a point to Jacobs last night, on re-watching it's now a point to GGG.
     
    pacas and Daft P like this.