Golovkin has been declining since right after David Lemiuex fight

Stop making excuses.

 

Start showing the ability to analyze anything about boxing.

 

Well when you deal with fanatics like the Goons on a daily, it's bound to happen. Theres a reason why GGG IS considered to have the worst fanbase in boxing.. But GGG lost that fight last night, no doubt about it and hearing these excuses from people who were saying just 3 days ago that GGG is the most versatile fighter of the last 15 years is pathetic.

 

Youre a pathetic poster...

 

You ***

 

What's your educational attainment? 10th grade dropout? 12 grade dropout? Or HS graduate who can barely read and comprehend his own diploma, but was pushed through the system anyways?

 

So erratic and irrational hatred of a fighter and letting it influence how you score a fight and view them is ok because some of their fans suck? What a load of BS. I had Jacobs winning by a round, but the wide cards in his favor all come from the usual suspects who hate GGG... Do you think that's a coincidence? There's much more bias and hatred on the other side than you're willing to admit.

 

Ask Roy Jones

 

Youre putting way too much thought into this.

 

Robert Allen fought Bernard Hopkins twice when Hopkins was early 30s. He then fought Hopkins a 3rd time when Hopkins was late 30s. He said it was like night and day. He said Hopkins was not even near what he was when Hopkins fought him the first two times.

 

It's the truth man.

 

He had quite the night against a guy who is by far his best opponent.

And just read all the threads before the match, Daniel Jacobs is nothing too special himself. Most people rate him way less than I do, too.

 

Not to be a smart ass but Jersey Joe Walcott existed.

 

GGG will be 35 in a month, he has for sure slowed down. He was never the fastest guy to begin with.

 

Agreed.
If you look at Froch when he was younger, he was faster on his feet and throwing more combinations with a higher workrate. When you watch Froch earlier in his career when he fought Woolnough, he had a greater workrate in my opinion. I know Woolnough wasnt at the same level as some of his later opponents but I really thought Froch was past his best before the S6 but many dismissed that later because of the great Bute win. Its like saying Foreman couldnt have been past his best because he beat Moorer