You wont be paying so not sure why you have a problem. PPV is working on Sky. You might not like it but the numbers do not lie.
Another day, another PPV, another thread by Jurgen complaining, another post of me saying "dont like it, dont buy it"
Whether you like it or not, for this fight to take place in the UK the only affordable way is to have it on PPV. You could have it at 4am over in america. But I would rather have it in the UK at Bramall lane, live at peak time on a saturday night. Which is much better for British boxing, rather than having it at 4 in the morning in USA. Not happy? Dont buy it. Simple as that.
Agree because this is a good fight. But AJ v Molina isn't. Everything isn't black and white, there is happy mediums. Just because some fights are PPV worthy doesn't mean the mis matches are.
Eh day promised Kelly Brook pay per view when he beat Kitchen Porter. Pay per view for non Sky Sports subscribers is understandable but shocking to charge existing Sky Sports subscribers. Will catch it in a bar somewhere again.
Very poor - struggling to justify paying for sky sports with so many ppvs. I see Spence outclassing Brook -- esp after he has balooned up in weight and is now coming back down. Fair play to him for taking Spence on though
It's a good fight for sure, a very good one in fact. Though I have issue with Eddie lumping it on PPV when he said "no one has heard of Spence"...but he was just trying to get out of the fight so it's whatever really. But here we are, a guy coming off a loss fighting his mandatory! So we have a good main event, do we think we'll get a decent undercard? I expect Quigg to get thrown on, hopefully in a meaningful fight or some description.
Quiggs already fighting at Wembley isn't he? i know Dave Allen v Ian Lewison is being talked about for this card but thats all i've heard on specifics and im fairly sure Hearn said there will be one more world title fight