How would prime Calzaghe have done in THE SUPER SIX??

Well I still think he wins even though im not a fan.

 

Yes, why is this thread 10 pages?

 

Funny troll post. So Dirrell who lost to Froch and was put down twice to Degale would suddenly beat the faster, higher workrate, better skilled most accomplished SMW of all time.
Not convinced Ward would even face Calzaghe as Ward didnt face boxer movers, he didnt fight Dirrell, wasnt interested in Bute and decided against Degale.
No doubt in my mind that Calzaghe would beat both

 

I don't expect a round by round an*lysis of a fight that never happened you cretin. I just wanted more than the usual: "He was faster and fitter etc"

He was faster and fitter than every opponent he faced, but he didn't clown them all, and they weren't as good as what Andre is. Do you understand??

Better footwork?

Higher ring IQ?

Ha!

Yes, I have respected other people's opinions who haven't agreed with me. Go and reread the posts.

No, there is no logic to state that Joe mutilates Andre. Again: List all of the guys he mutilated.

Yes, I can list Hopkins as an example of why he wouldn't. Andre has similarities to Hopkins. Again: Joe didn't mutilate Hopkins, nor Reid or Bika, nor lots of other guys who were inferior. Did he just have a lot of off nights? Or have you just exaggerated?

I never said you claimed he fought a lot of southpaws. You're not even reading the posts properly.

You said he'd have mutilated Chad Dawson. Okay, on what grounds? Why do you think that?

Is it:

1. Because Joe fought a lot of elite southpaws and he showed qualities that you think he could have exploited?

2. Because you're a clueless imbecile debating on emotion?

 

I think Toney and RJJ would have won the super 6 as well. prime RJJ would probably do so very easily.

 

He did make some top SMW's look like amateurs.

That however does not mean he'd have beaten everyone in the Super Six with ease.

 

Calzaghe has fought one fighter who was on a serious big time level. That was Kessler. Who's more of an A- level fighter than an A level or A+ level fighter. That win alone along with guys like Lacy isn't stiff enough competition to have him as a definite favorite if he was in that tournament.

I'm not counting his fights with old guys.

 

Still struggling to read, huh?


Let's try again:

I RESPECT LOGICAL OPINIONS.


I'm not going to respect some nut who states:

"Joe would have mutilated Ward"

"Joe would have mutilated Dawson"

"Joe would have won the Super Six easy"


Those aren't opinions to respect, because they are completely illogical, based purely on emotion. Joe didn't easily beat all of the opponents he fought in real time, so he wouldn't easily have beaten Froch, Ward and Dirrell etc.

Has that registered, Einstein?

 

Still plodding along with this nonsense?

How long's it been now? 4 years?

I have never posted what I think a fighter was thinking. I only once posted a direct quote from a fighter's interview, that included a link so everyone could view it.

The only other thing I've done is to question a fighter's mindset. But whenever I've done so, I've always used facts and a offered logical explination as to why I hold my opinion.

The problem with you, is that although you're a highly entertaining poster, you're completely biased and out of touch with reality.

You also ignore facts, and when you can't win a debate, you go missing.