How would prime Calzaghe have done in THE SUPER SIX??

I'm the troll?

Ha!

Sure.

Some of the things you've typed is cringeworthy.

 

A crush for Calzaghe lose?

Ha!

What is that?

That doesn't make sense chief.

Again, yes, it's only my opinion that Joe wouldn't have dominated Ward with ease. But I have history on my side. At the end of the day, it's a FACT that Joe didn't dominate elite fighters like Ward with absolute ease like they were nothing. You can't dispute that you clown. There is zero logic to state he'd have embarrassed Ward when he struggled with lesser fighters but who had similarities with his style.

Regarding the poll, it doesn't bother me at all. Because I'd be willing to bet that the majority of the guys who think that Joe would have beaten Ward and won the tournament, don't think that he'd have done it with absolute ease.

I'll gladly disqualify myself from any further debate with you, because you're one of the biggest C*NTS on this forum, who knows nothing about the fighters you're speaking of. You're an absolute cretin who's not even worth my time. You debate like a child, and you've completeley ruined what could have been a good thread.

 

I know what you meant to say you clown, but you're so thick you can't even insult me properly.

"The same crush for Calzaghe lose" isn't a coherent sentence.

Ha!

What you're trying to say is: "I have/had a crush on SEEING Joe lose.


Not only are you unable to string along basic words to make a sentence, the claim that you've made is completely false.

I've repeatedly said that Joe was a great fighter, and I can definitely envisage him beating Ward and winning the tournament. My only gripe is that there's no logic to state that he'd have beaten Ward like he was nothing with absolute ease, when again: he never beat guys of Ward's calibre with ease THROUGHOUT HIS ENTIRE CAREER.


No, I haven't said 2 completeley different things.

Tell me where I said to you:

"I'll gladly debate you because you're a......"


Once again: You can't read properly.

What I actually said, was:

"I'll GLADLY DISQUALIFY MYSELF FROM ANY FURTHER DEBATE WITH YOU, BECAUSE..."


You need to do the following things:

1. Learn basic English.

2. Carefully read what people have written.

3. Debate with facts and logic instead of emotion.

 

I've made an idiot of myself?

Ha!

Are you for real?

This is now your THIRD attempt in trying to write out what you mean.

A small child could write out: You share a crush for seeing/wanting to have seen Calzaghe lose.

Missed a lot of school, huh?


How can I have an infatuation in trying to belittle his achievements, when again:

1. I've said he was a great fighter.

2. I've said I think he could have beaten Ward.

3. I think he could have won the tournament.

???


Keep the posts coming. I've now changed my mind. I'll now gladly continue to make you look like a fool. Although it's not hard considering you can't read or write properly.

 

Todd498,

Bail out?

Ha!

You don't even possess basic English skills.

We all know what you were trying to say, but you just lack the intelligence to be able to write it down properly.

You're not riling me up, you're entertaining me for the afternoon.

You haven't hit me with facts and logic.

There is no logic in stating that Joe would have mutilated Ward, when he never mutilated anyone of Ward's calibre throughout his entire career.

The same applies to your comments regarding Dawson.

Joe only had 2 fights at LHW, and he hardly fought any southpaws throughout his career.

So where's the logic?

I'll wait for you to explain it to me.

I was going to disqualify myself from the debate. But because you've given me such a laugh with your lack of basic English skills, I'm now more than happy to remain.

I don't need a crystal ball.

I watched Joe's career in it's entirety.

It's a stone cold FACT that throughout his ENTIRE career, he never easily dominated a guy of Andre's calibre.

Do you understand?

He couldn't dominate Robin Reid, Sakio Bika or Bernard Hopkins. They were all good-great fighters with similar attributes. Yet Andre was faster and had more overall ability.

Work it out for yourself.


Again: The only reason you're trying to convince yourself that Joe would have mutilated him, is because of your hatred of Andre Ward.

Most of the knowledgeable fans on this forum know that it would have been a very hard fight for both guys. Even the majority of people who think Joe would have won realise it.


Now are you going to tell my why you think Joe would have mutilated Chad Dawson?

 

That's all you could manage as a response?

Seriously?

 

Yes, CONSIDERING HE NEVER DESTROYED GUYS OF WARD'S CALIBRE.