Gennady Golovkin's reign surpasses Marvin Hagler's reign

I don't like the ibo either but a clown couldn't win it lol, you have to be a top 20 boxer which is no easy task.

 

hagler quit an undisputed reign of boxing (albeit on a loss) at an age before 3g's age when he WON his first world title.

the two are in entirely different leagues.

 

that one from IT could.
yet it is not world level at all.

 

from IT? what's that? What boxer

 

And I agree the ibo is the worst belt. Didn't some Aussie just win an ibo beating the corpse of Geale at 168? lol

 

Here we go again with the superior fighters of yesteryear stop living in dream land. Today's fighters are more efficient and actually place their shots. Of course the old fighters looked better swinging away for fifteen rounds. They would get totally humiliated today by any decent fighter.

 

put that by me again - hearns hag duran didnt place shots? why?

 

sorryi meant the stephen king IT clown

 

LOL, maybe you are right.

I really, really like Hagler, though.

There are a lot of parallels on how he was avoided and how GGG has been avoided. Duran and Hearns were huge wins. Mugabi too. Hamsho, Antuofermo, Minter etc ... he didn't exactly fight a bunch of scrubs.

That said it sometimes takes a while for a fighter's legacy to gain its proper context. Guys like Lemieux, Jacobs, Brook, Monroe may go on to do impressive things that improve the class of the wins for GGG.

 

The man who beat the man still counts you Pac turned GG fan. Bandwagon ass lmao.

 

Here we go again with cliched clueless drivel.

 

Because he's short?

 

Its a shame GGG hasn't the comp to show how good he was a few year ago