How would prime Calzaghe have done in THE SUPER SIX??

Well I hear coccaine is a hell of a drug.

 

not a patch on lidocaine and xylocaine. joe was unlucky they weren't allowed

 

Well we probably score better coke here in the states too so.....

 

just disapatching the hands comment in relation to mayweather

 

You know all about the top SMWs from which era? All? Thats interesting. Tell me what you know about Mark Baker?
As for Froch/Johnson. Dont take it from me that the fight was debatable even though it was a majority decision. Just go back and look at some of the posts on here the day after. Ottke didnt have as many problems with prime G Johnson.
As for Ottke not wanting to face Calzaghe, I agree. His trainer admitted Ottke wasnt interested in doing so, but then neither was Ward with Bute

 

Yeah, I'm just linking drug references.

 

Cant say where I ever wrote Jones was overated. If you are referring to the part I copied and pasted, I noted that was another posters comment. Still below is a bit of the what you want to make of it and yes Hopkins does get credit with his age but lest not get silly and look below

Lost to Sheika who lost to Calzaghe

Beat Hopkins and lost to Calzaghe

Was a WW facing a fighter who turned pro as a CW. That is not even as good a win as Calzaghes over Lacy

Once again, that was a fighter who turned pro as a SFW facing a fighter who turned pro as a CW. See above

Beat Hopkins. So are you scoring points for Hopkins losing? lol

Lost to Green who lost to Mitchell who lost to Calzaghe

Who was a MW fighting at LHW and who Hopkins was facing after losing to Calzaghe

Lost to Jones who Calzaghe beat

Was a LMW fighting a LHW. Wright lost to H Simon and fighting at LHW wasnt as good a win as Calzaghes over Woodhall

Lost to Froch who lost to Kessler who lost to Calzaghe

Lost to Pascal who Lost to Froch who lost to Kessler who lost to Calzaghe

Shocked you noted these wins but not even as good as Calzaghes over Mitchell and Reid

Hopkins lost

So Toney shouting over a phone is punking someone lol. Yes thats right Eubank was just about to engage in the then arguably biggest SMW fight ever and unification bout whilst Toney was getting ready for Prather. That says it all there.
Kessler clearly beat Andrade which shows you havent watched that fight

So what we know is that you score Hopkins resume on losses which shows you are reaching terribly.
You also rate it when fighters are facing naturally smaller fighters and even fighters who turned pro a whole 8 divisions from where their opponent turned pro.

So once again we know that Hopkins had no wins at an even weight greater than prime Kessler or Eubank and most of Hopkins best wins were beaten by fighters Calzaghe dominated.

There is the real answer there

 

Prime Calzaghe wouldn't have entered the super 6, or would have signed up on his terms like Ward did.

 

Go to the lounge lmao

 

Btw RJJ and Bhop rank over Calzaghe by a margin of 10 slots on ESPN's top 25 fighters in the last 25 years. Another reference you care to mention.

 

to be fair its an american list, im sure if a welsh publication made a list they would have calzaghe ahead of them

 

You are really badly embarrassing yourself with your triangle theories.

 

Fair enough.

 

What happened in the last 10 pages of this thread? Its clear that calzaghe at his best would win the super 6.

 

shame zags didn't move to hw or fight primes at lhw. since he beat old jones, then triangle theory means he would have unifed and defended at LHW and won a HW title to boot.

bit more than his swm largely unrecognised wbo-only defences (plus one ibf). he couldda outdone Bob fitzsimmons if only he had bothered!lol

and trev berbick is atg no 1 hw for beating ali. triangle shyte.