Handsome Hughie Lewis Fury

Rudenko vs Browne was a good scrap.

 

Check the scores again:

http://boxrec.com/boxer/643611

Hughie has not won every round of every fight. Not sure why you can't accept the fact.

 

The scoring system used in professional boxing is called the '10 must system' and the basis of it is the winner of a round is to be awarded 10 points.

Therefore if you win every round of a 10 round fight, with no deductions, your score reads 100.

In the Rudenko fight, which was over 10 rounds duration, no judge awarded Hughie Fury 100 points.

Fury was awarded 98, 98 and 97 points respectively from the 3 judges. Meaning they each had him losing rounds to Rudenko.

 

I've watched the fight. I don't need to reference BoxRec.

The issue is not wether he won the rounds or not, it's your use of statistics from a website to form an argument rather than actually watching the sport and forming an opinion yourself. If you had watched the fight, you would be able to tell me which rounds you thought he lost, but you haven't seen it and even if you had I doubt your ability to interpret it.

Move along now.

 

Goddamn are you dense.

Hughie stated he won all his rounds. The judges, as in the people who determine who won a round, said he lost rounds against Rudenko. You can claim Hughie deserved those rounds, but that's irrelevant. Those rounds were counted as losses, contrary to Hughie's claims.

It's unequivocal. Undeniable.

 

in fairness that total no body rudencko beat lucas browne

 

As I said they are Hughies words not mine.

Which rounds are you talking about that he lost in the Rudenko fight anyway?

 

in fairness though if you had watched the fight you would know that it was possible to score it a shutout.

same way if floyd said he won every round against canelo, are you going to say he's lying as one judge had him losing 6 rounds?

 

Are you touched in the head? I'm not even saying that to be insulting. You keep repeating the same statements without any comprehension of the points people are making. I hope you have a caretaker.

The are the facts:
1. Hughie said he never lost any rounds.
2. The judges said Hughie lost rounds against Rudenko.
3. The judges are the people who determine who won/lost a round.

Conclusion:
1. Hughie officially lost rounds.
2. Hughie is full of it.

This is all that matters. Not whether you argue Hughie actually deserved those rounds.

The are the facts:
1. Hughie said he never lost any rounds.
2. The judges said Hughie lost rounds against Rudenko.
3. The judges are the people who determine who won/lost a round.

Conclusion:
1. Hughie officially lost rounds.
2. Hughie is full of it.

This is all that matters. Not whether you argue Hughie actually deserved those rounds.

 

the point is scoring in boxing in subjective, if someone believes they have barely lost a round as a pro when they have lost a handful then thats their opinion and they are entitled to it. Roy jones jr was judged to have lost he's olympic final, if roy jones says he didn't lose that fight, is he also full of it?

 

Saying who deserved the win is subjective.

Saying who actually won is not subjective.

Hughie claiming he won all his rounds is factually false.

 

how do you know he wasn't saying it from he's subjective point of view and no based on judges opinion?

you are reading way too much into this, and if you watched the fight you could see how it could have been scored a shutout, he is very good defensively he makes everyround close at worst

 

I think people are quibbling over a lot of nothing right about now. It was a throwaway statement anyway.

 

exactly, and not a delusional one either, he has a strong argument for what he was saying subjectively

its no like some guy who had been knocked ouy 5 times saying he has never lost a fight

 

Because every fighter claims this bull****. It's ridiculous.

No one cares about your Goddamn opinions. It's meaningless.

The facts are that Hughie lost rounds.

And if you could comprehend basic logic you would understand that's not the point.