How would prime Calzaghe have done in THE SUPER SIX??

On a phone this is s bit too much to reply to. Fact is all of this was destroyed by serges post that you ran from after he posted.
You seem to be pretending all of that happened.
Calzaghe only had 11 days notice no sparring for eubank, bad hands.
You forget after the Watson fight that eubank made over 10 defences.
You try and make all this out and forget when degale fought bute that bute was older, been kod, not fought at the weight for longer, had lost last time he had and didn't win at the weight again, yet you say eubank was shot when pushing a cw champ
Loudon lol

 

On a phone this is s bit too much to reply to. Fact is all of this was destroyed by serges post that you ran from after he posted.
You seem to be pretending all of that happened.
Calzaghe only had 11 days notice no sparring for eubank, bad hands.
You forget after the Watson fight that eubank made over 10 defences.
You try and make all this out and forget when degale fought bute that bute was older, been kod, not fought at the weight for longer, had lost last time he had and didn't win at the weight again, yet you say eubank was shot when pushing a cw champ
Loudon lol

 

Why is it.
You can't respect the opinions of others who you disagree with
I am sadly of the opinion that you are trolling and just like arguing with the belief your opinions are the only ones that count

 

Post of the thread right here

Sadly I now think loudon is trolling after giving him the benefit of the doubt for a long time.

As you pointed out, he seems of the opinion that he is the deciding factor of what's logical and does seem to enjoy a keyboard argument rather than a sensible debate, which he can't have as he doesn't respect others opinions

 

You pick me up on it all of the time.

I don't mind. As it never happened, it's just a source of entertainment.

Who are these other posters? Nobody of relevance. Just clowns like Joe.Boxer who will jump on board with anyone who's being critical of me. This is exactly what Todd is doing now, and it's the reason he's liked all of your posts.

You can keep saying it over and over. It won't make it true.

My facts are facts, that can be backed up at a moments notice, with links, videos and book excerpts etc. My opinions may not be factual, but they are always logical, and I'm always happy to explain why I think the way I do.

After debating with you for 5 years, I know you only type this out when you can't answer all of my points. It's just a default setting of yours.

 

Why do you keep posting this nonsense?

On this very thread I have said that I respect opinions that I don't agree with.

Go and read the posts.

 

More nonsense.

You're just rambling off topic.

Congratulations, your predictions were correct.

And?

So what if I don't make prediction threads? I'm never interested enough to do that. I'll have an opinion, and sometimes I'm right and sometimes I'm wrong. But I don't need to make threads.

 

The fact is: You're living in a fantasy world.

If you can find the thread, bump it.

Ran from? Ha! I don't run from any debate. I countered all of Serge's links, and I responded with many of my own.

I seem to be pretending all of that happened? Hey, IT DID HAPPEN! Everything I wrote is FACTUAL.

Stop embarrassing yourself.

Now I'll give you a compliment and note that you have a lot of knowledge of past and present British fighters, especially those who fight/fought in the SMW division. So why are you digging your heels in regarding Eubank? The only logic answer, is that you just won't admit your bias for Joe. Because you love telling posters of your knowledge of the SMW division, as well as questioning their own. So if you possess the knowledge that you think you do and you were watching at the time, you'd know that Eubank was never the same fighter after the Watson fight. You'd know that both he and Barry Hearn have acknowledged it. You'd also know that Eubank admitted he should have lost to Benn and Schommer, and that an awful lot of people think he lost to Close. So Eubank was lucky to fight Joe without having at least 4 losses on his resume. And although he proved he still had a lot of gas in the tank, he simply wasn't the fighter he'd been against Watson.

I never said he was shot. I said he was faded, and then even retracted my initial statement to say he was somewhat faded. But like Todd, you only see what you want to see.

The facts is: You cannot refute any of what I wrote. They are all facts, and if you want me to post up the links of what Eubank has said about his fight with Joe throughout the years, I'll gladly oblige.

 

More desperation tactics from you.

It's hilarious.

You cannot refute what I've said. So the next best thing, is for you to lie, and then side with anyone who's critical of me. The only problem is, you've chosen Todd.


Todd is a guy who:

Doesn't have the intelligence to read posts in their entirety.

Misinterprets the bits he does read.

Can't even form a simple sentence.


I actually felt bad for embarrassing him last week. I felt a little guilty.


A sensible debate? What constitutes as a sensible debate in your opinion? Because all Todd has done, is make outlandish, illogical claims, backed up with insults and emojis. That's it.


For the last time: I can respect other people's opinions if they're logical. But saying Joe would have mutilated Ward like he was nothing, isn't logical. Andre Ward is an A level, elite fighter. Joe never mutilated an A level fighter. That's a FACT. Bernard Hopkins shares similarities with Ward, yet Joe didn't mutilate him. That's a FACT. Joe didn't mutilate some B and C class guys who he fought. That's also a FACT.

Todd debates on emotion instead of logic.


Now come back with something. And I'm fed up of your predictable excuses:

The post is too long to respond to, shorten it.

I'm busy at the moment, I'll return at a later date.


Come back and debate with me in a proper manner. And if you're going to side with another poster who doesn't like me, at least choose one who's not illiterate.

 

What do you expect for a RJJ water carrier? He also uses far too many words to articulate his patronizing points, very condescending not to mention annoying.

 

It's a real honour to have you here Kevin. We're truly blessed.

 

You've got far too much to worry about without thinking of me.

 

Finally, something we can agree upon. Common ground is not so hard to find heh louddumb?