Hard to put some of in order of importance as well as shock value but here's mine: 1. Buster Douglas KO10 Mike Tyson 2. Hasim Rahman KO5 Lennox Lewis 3. Michael Spinks W15 Larry Holmes 4. Leon Spinks W15 Muhammad Ali 5. James Braddock W15 Max Baer 6. Muhammad Ali KO8 George Foreman 7. Cassius Clay RTD6 Sonny Liston 8. Lamont Brewster KO5 Wladimir Klitschko 9. Oliver McCall KO5 Lennox Lewis 10. Evander Holyfield KO11 Mike Tyson
Perfect. Perfect order. Perfect fighters. Only thing you can add is if you expanded another #11-20. Next tier: Berbick W12 Thomas. Bonecrusher KO1 Witherspoon. Sanders KO2 Wladimir Klitschko. Tunney W10 Dempsey Corbett KO21 Sullivan
Be my guest,Sangria if you or anyone else wants to expand it to include more. Btw, why was Dempsey/Tunney scheduled for 10 rounds only rather than the usual 15?
Dempsey's camp proposed it, probably because he had a poor training camp. Tunney's camp reasoned that it was easier to stay away from Dempsey for ten rounds, so they raised no objection.
The order seems a bit skewed here. So Spinks-Holmes or Rahman-Lewis was a bigger upset than Ali-Foreman/Liston?
There is some truth in that. Admittedly it is with the benefit of hindsight, but it is a lot harder to place the Ali/Liston and the Ali/Foreman upsets any higher IMO, because the guy providing the upsets in those fights is a fighter that was to go on to be generally regarded by most boxing people as being the top one or two greatest heavyweights ever. As for the other fights, Holmes though he was 35 at the time, he was still unbeaten and at 48-0 was one win away from equalling Marciano's record. It was supposed to be a sure thing picking Spinks especially as no reigning Light heavyweight champion in history had ever captured the heavyweight crown. For the Rahman/Lewis upset, the fact that Rahman was a 20-1 underdog shows how highly regarded Lewis was at the time and what a practically no-hoper Rahman was supposed to be. As a point of interest, the general odds for the other above fights. Liston was a 7-1 favourite against Ali, Foreman was a 4-1/3-1 odds on favourite against Ali and Holmes was a 6-1 odds on pick against Spinks.
I would have to add Toney-Holyfield to that list. Especially the way it played out. Evander may have slowed down quite a bit by then, but, who could have ever envisioned the much smaller Toney becoming the predator, beating up and stopping the amazingly durable Evander?
01 Douglas-Tyson 02 Foreman-Frazier 03 Ali-Foreman 04 Clay-Liston 05 Patterson-Johansson 06 Braddock-Baer 07 Rahman-Lewis 08 Tunney-Dempsey 09 Spinks-Ali 10 Walcott-Charles
Turns out not the best option for the Tunney camp...I believe that Tunney would have tko'ed Dempsey had the bout been scheduled for 15 or more.