Khan to thurman "Forget Porter fight me"

it wont be 'Some time' it will be 'One time' if he fights kahn

 

Collazo was coming off of a near 2 year lay off.
Chris Algieri was supposed to be a cherry pick.
He fought Molina after having his shell cracked by an unknown Danny Garcia.
And the reason he has not fought a no hope lately is because he was chasing checks from Mayweather and Pacquiao. Boxing is rigged for the fanboys now and Khan has a legion.

 

Khan lol

 

He's delusional. Thurman will fight in any order PAC (unlikely due to promotion), Porter or the winner of Spence v Brook. Khan has to wait his turn and I don't think he's entitled to skip that line.

 

Khan needs to get in line and earn a title shot.

Too many times this fraud has talked his way into big fights with just his filthy mouth.

 

Khan could at least make Thurman's 'One Time' nickname relevant again because he hasn't KOed anyone on ages.

 

Khan doesn't deserve a title shot, let alone a shot against
the number 1a or 1b WW.

If he wants a fight, let him go avenge that embarrassing
loss vs Danny, or let him get fed to Porter, or go fight Berto,
Thurman is out of the question, honestly Brook and Pac should be out of
the question for Khan as well.

The ****in audacity of Khan.

 

Does Khan deserve it? Nope.
Would I be happy to watch Thurman KO him? Yes.

 

Well, firstly, I am not a Khan fan boy.

However, I don't have a problem with him and I do enjoy his fights. He's rarely in a bad fight.

Molina was undefeated and a decent opponent for anyone coming off a loss.

Algeri was also decent enough. An ex belt holder who went life and death with Provodnikov and lasted the distance with Pacquiao.

Lay off or not Collazo and also Diaz are both tough fights for anyone, they both came to win.

These guys may not be ATGs but they are credible top ten contenders.

There may be other fights you'd rather see him in, but there's nothing wrong with Khan's level of opposition.

Win or lose Khan has consistently fought champions and top ten fighters. What is wrong with that?

It seems that almost everyone hates Khan, but the truth is Khan has one of the best resumes in boxing today. He has more decent names on his record than most.

 

Go list all theses champion fighters and top ten fighters and see where they were at that moment in time in their careers barring Paulie
The fighters he lost to don't count
Alexander is done
Kotlenik fought twice after losing one and winning one done
Judah was and is done
Barrera two fights later and was done
Gomez was finished twelve months later done
Earl fought four more times losing three done
Kristjansen three fights later done
McCloskey two years later done
Molina just no don't bang on about canelhoe size and weight when khasn took this fight

 

^ Such criticisms can be levelled at most fighters. Go trawl through most boxing records and Khan's record looks pretty good by comparison.

At least Khan doesn't have any Rod Salka's or Jo Jo Dan's on his record.

 

Both said fighters ranked higher than ***an

 

Haha let the khan butthurt flow !

 

So what?

Your statement is untrue in any case.

Salka was dragged up two weight classes and Dan was manipulated into a "mandatory" position to give Brook an easy fight.

Fact is the likes of Salka and Dan would be beaten badly by any one of Khan's past dozen or so opponents.

 

So what about salka that was a gift for swift go and see the bangers he as been in with especially on the way up on about c v,s Garcia s is shutting all over khans
And Dan being moved into mandatory was he top ten ranked our not
I know its scary your boy is on the very edge of obscurity and is a joke on every boxing forum