Rigo approaching 37

Ummm, yeah you over analyzed that one. But it shows your possibly homosexual fondness of Lomachenko. You are thinking about Crawford sexually owning him, instead of owning him in the ring. That is fairly gay on your part.

 

I gave you the benefit of the doubt and assumed you were using the gay thing as a symbolic insult, as it turns out you were being literal. Wow. Well nothing wrong with you having those fantasies, I suppose it makes sense for someone that feels powerless to get off on such things.

My issue as clearly stated, was you using offensive terminology and insulting Lomachenko for his team not wanting a fight with a Champion two divisions up just yet. You don't like Lomachenko so you would stretch something that understandable into an insecure derogatory tantrum. It's as bad as someone saying...Golovkin is Crawford's father. You wouldn't say that, because you know full well Crawford can't be expected to face a man two divisions higher.

 

Ummm, yeah you over analyzed that one. But it shows your possibly homosexual fondness of Lomachenko. You are thinking about Crawford sexually owning him, instead of owning him in the ring. That is fairly gay on your part.

 

Okay, we get it, you think I'm gay because I called you out for not only erroneously claiming Lomachenko was ducking Crawford but using random sexual terminology to enhance your language. Good for you. You are straight as an arrow for writing this post.

 

You had to jump in and defend the honor of your boycrush. I'm a fan of Lomachenko, as I am a fan of defensively sound technical boxers. I just point out hypocrisy from clowns like you. You are perturbed because Lomachenko's own people acknowledged that Crawford is daddy.

 

i didn't fabricate anything, moron. i said it is more money than he got sitting on his ass. btw, show me where i run my mouth about lomachenko. if he won he was supposedly getting a million, btw.

 

There was no contract with a 500K to the winner stipulation, so yeah you did fabricate. Rigs simply told Arum pay him to fight at 126. 400K and change is a lowball offer to someone that got 800K for Donaire and 500K for Amagasa, both lesser opponents than Lomachenko.

 

To be fair donaire was a bigger name than loma was so thats why he got more money.

 

i didn't fabricate it and you saying it didn't exist means jack ****. you really need help with reading comprehension. all i said was he makes more money fighting then sitting on his ass. if he didn't want a bet, he still would have made half a million he will never see now.

 

Fair point. Many people don't realize though that Arum was over paying Lomachenko to fight scrubs. When Rigs, Walters and Salido see that Lomachenko gets 800K to fight bums, while they are offered 300 to 400K to fight Lomachenko, therein lies the problem. This was before Loma had beaten Martinez. Can't blame guys for refusing to be lowballed and not taking short money for a tough fight.

 

To be fair the reason loma probably gets that money is because when loma turned pro I'd say there was an insane bidding war to sign the hottest prospect maybe ever to turn pro

 

Okay.

Explain this hypocrisy, I'm interested in hearing what I said that forced you to do this.

Produce the quote where this is stated.

Note: admitting you don't wish to challenge a Champion two weight classes higher is not a submission of one's manhood and appointing said Champion as your daddy.

After Mayweather said Golovkin was too big, did you start referring to Golovkin as Mayweather's daddy?

 

If you've been on the forum long enough, and seen my posts on Mayweather, you would know I've been a critic of him as well. If he could fight Canelo, and De La Hoya at 154, but not Golovkin, that makes him seem like the coward many think he is with his selective match making. Fighting Berto, instead of a youmg lion like Thurman, or rematching Pac and making far more than what he got for Berto, etc. I'm no fanboy of any fighter. I've even been critical of Rigondeaux before as well.

 

So don't be a hypocrite and state "Golovkin is Mayweather's Daddy" or "Mayweather admits Golovkin is his father." Use your terminology fairly.

 

Don't be upset with me, be upset with Lomachenko's manager for insinuating that Crawford is Lomachenko's daddy. I wasn't the one who made it some sexual thing. That was one of you.