Gene Tunney = underappreciated?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by JoffJoff, Apr 24, 2017.


  1. JoffJoff

    JoffJoff Regular Junkie Full Member

    1,978
    1,498
    Jan 25, 2017
    Considering Tunney fought and defeated every man he ever fought through multiple weight classes, only losing a single fight (later avenged) to Greb, who routinely places top 3 in ATG lists. The 'Fighting Marine' was considered a master technician and boasts an impressive list of scalps on his resume. He was also revered by his peers but I notice he typically places modestly, around top 20 - why doesn't he rank higher in these all time rankings?
     
  2. Hookandjab

    Hookandjab Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,618
    551
    Feb 19, 2014
    Gene Tunney may well have been the greatest lightheavy and heavyweight champ of all time. There is what I call era chauvinism. Fighters from a different era couldn't be on the same level as our special time in history - or could they?
     
    Fergy likes this.
  3. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,031
    45,259
    Feb 11, 2005
    Overappreciated as a heavyweight. Underappreciated as LB4LB guy.
     
  4. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,957
    2,410
    Jul 11, 2005
    Why not read some contemporary opinions about him prior to his wins over Dempsey and then compare these opinions with what same experts wrote about *real* ATG fighters from the same epoch or a little earlier?
     
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,522
    27,094
    Feb 15, 2006
    I think he is judged just right to be honest.

    He was the best heavyweight in the world by a significant margin, but his decision to retire in his prime curtailed his accomplishments on paper.

    This seems to be the view that most people take.
     
  6. richdanahuff

    richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,469
    13,005
    Oct 12, 2013

    This content is protected
     
    RockyJim likes this.
  7. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    29,627
    36,320
    Jul 24, 2004
    Way over appreciated. Beat a worn out Dempsey only due to a referee's mistake.
    Was SAVAGED by a middleweight (Grebb), albeit a great MW.
    Did not fight even one single black fighter. Yes he called out Wills who turned down
    the opportunity but there it is.

    Maybe at LWH he's in the conversation but at HW...please, practically every HW
    champ from Johnson to Wlad gives him cramps. Louis obliterates him. A young
    Dempsey KO's him. Marciano beats him up like Grebb did. His moves, especially his
    footwork look good on the old film but put him in there with Roy Jones Jr and I guarantee
    he'll look like he's stuck in molasses.

    Dude was a good, crafty fighter but was fortunate to be in an "inbetween" time for
    great LHW's and HW's.
     
  8. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,631
    Mar 17, 2010
    Underrated.
     
    RockyJim likes this.
  9. andrewa1

    andrewa1 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,005
    2,071
    Apr 8, 2013
    Arguably overappreciated as a HW. Basically his whole hw campaign was beating an ATG twice then calling it a career.

    Would have been comparable to Fury beating Wlad in a rematch and THEN going crazy and retiring. Nobody would have Fury in top 20 ATG HW ranking, but almost everyone has Tunney that high(hell, I have him around 15).

    Pound for pound underrated though.
     
    RockyJim likes this.
  10. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,453
    Jan 6, 2007
    Some books stated that Tunney was envisioning fighting Dempsey going back to Gene's WWI days.
    Gene, like Schmeling with young Louis, probably thought "I think I see's something".
     
    RockyJim likes this.
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,522
    27,094
    Feb 15, 2006
    The elephant in the room that nobody mentions is the gulf between what he could have been, and what he was.

    He was probably as good as he had ever been when he retired.

    The best heavyweights around at the time were Jack Sharkey, Johnny Risko, and old Dempsey (probably the best of the three).

    Had he defeated a few more contenders, we probably could talk about him as a top ten heavyweight today.
     
  12. louis54

    louis54 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,187
    1,302
    Mar 20, 2013
    H2h Tunney beats almost all the heavys...that is how good he is...possibly greatest Lt heavy ever...I have Tunney in top 5 ever heavyweights...thanks
     
    RockyJim likes this.
  13. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,527
    Apr 26, 2015
    Greatest technical boxer to ever hold the hwt championship. Superbly conditioned, great jab, tough, great heart and will to win and underrated power. On any given night at his best he could beat anyone.
     
    louis54 and RockyJim like this.
  14. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,631
    Mar 17, 2010
    His performance in the second Dempsey fight is one of the best I've ever seen.
     
    louis54, RockyJim and Rumsfeld like this.
  15. JoffJoff

    JoffJoff Regular Junkie Full Member

    1,978
    1,498
    Jan 25, 2017
    You guys honestly believe he could beat the best versions of the SHWs such as Lewis and Klitschkos? I understand he was revered in his time as an extremely skilled operator but he is severely undersized for a HW and hardly renowned for his power. Would seem to me a tall order but I would be interested in hearing any breakdowns for how Tunney could pull off such a feat against Lennox Lewis for example?