Alexander Povetkin vs. Max Baer

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by reznick, Apr 26, 2017.


  1. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,510
    24,265
    Jul 21, 2012
    You posted a lie. I corrected it. You I couldn't care about.
     
  2. Pugilist_Spec

    Pugilist_Spec Hands Of Stone Full Member

    4,937
    787
    Aug 17, 2015
    As crude as Baer may have been, Povetkin doesn't employ a style that can take advantage of that. He may be more skilled in close quarters, but Baer is more powerful, more vicious and more durable and that's what's ultimately going to give him the win.
     
    reznick likes this.
  3. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    61,057
    81,531
    Aug 21, 2012
    You posted "whatever". Try again, numbnuts.
     
  4. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,095
    47,026
    Feb 11, 2005
    A lot of Baer's power came from selling out on huge, windmill haymakers. Povetkin, who is very durable himself, would eat alive that kind of offense with timing and precise shots. And Povetkin hits plenty hard himself and almost always punches in bunches.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  5. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    61,057
    81,531
    Aug 21, 2012
    Exactly what I think and already said :thumbsup:
     
    Seamus likes this.
  6. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,692
    9,895
    Jun 9, 2010
    I agree with this.

    I would add, though, that Povetkin's workrate might just see him through, as it seems to have on at least a couple of other occasions I can think of.
     
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2017
  7. Pugilist_Spec

    Pugilist_Spec Hands Of Stone Full Member

    4,937
    787
    Aug 17, 2015
    That may be true to some extent, but it was just a part of his image. At times he got serious, Baer was able to deliver quick and devastating punches and counters with great fluency. The Comiskey KO is a good example of this.

    Baer just seems like a gutsier, more ballsy fighter who would enjoy the type of fight Povetkin would force. Povetkin looked lost against Huck, who much like Baer wasn't exactly the epitome of skill and finesse but knew how to fight ugly and dirty.

    I'll still admit that Povetkin could very well take this with his power and combos - I just think Baer could soak up the damage more efficiently and end the fight before that happens.
     
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,095
    47,026
    Feb 11, 2005
    OK, you're asking us to ignore the many fights where Baer wasn't entirely serious because those apparently weren't his best performances, then you bring up Povetkin's fight against Huck as proof to your stance.

    Some might say you are trying to have your cake and eat it, too.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  9. Pugilist_Spec

    Pugilist_Spec Hands Of Stone Full Member

    4,937
    787
    Aug 17, 2015
    I did say that I partially agree with you. Baer did often windmill his way to victory, but it should be acknowledged that he was a showman as much as a fighter, was prone to taunting his opponent and engaging recklessly but still displayed very, very good punching technique when he had to.

    I brought up the Huck fight because Hucks fighting style and tactics resemble Baers the most, out of Povetkins opponents.
     
  10. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Against Primo maybe those stick out more, but he could also deliver a lot of power with much shorter punches.
     
  11. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,262
    25,628
    Jan 3, 2007
  12. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,095
    47,026
    Feb 11, 2005
    So you did... and said it well, too.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  13. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    61,057
    81,531
    Aug 21, 2012
    So, the worst Povetkin, vs the best Baer. I see where this is going ...