Joe Jeannette V Jack Dempsey,Joe Louis,Jack Johnson?

Wow, haven't been here w any regularity in ages and a bit shocked to see the degree of mean spirited behavior. Not that it is happening but that the same characters are spewing it .. so much for mellowing w age ..

Jeannette would likely have the best shot against Dempsey based on his chin and toughness. Unless Jack took him out early which is unlikely as no one ever did, Joe could give him a hell of a go. Dempsey's fifteen round stamina was only tested once. I believe the best Dempsey beats him but who knows .. ?

 

LOL booohoo.

No, the child is the one who gets jealous and butthurt over the fact that he cant have something he wants.

I can talk about it all day long, can you? Besides what Ive told you you had no idea about any of that because one of us has actually studied those subjects and the other would rather just play at being an actual historian. One of us went to school for the subject and the other didnt go to school at all. Sorry chunky but the Marines isnt a school and its not exactly an exclusive club either. Some of the smartest people I know were Marines but some the dumbest most socially maladjusted people are as well. They dont exactly set the bar high, the military is after all the largest employer in the nation. just keep that in mind when you are trying to match wits with your betters and pretending that your service makes you anything special.

Im not bragging about what I HAVE, Im reiterating what I have DONE. Two different things. You seem to be the one fixated on what I have, like the child you mentioned above.

We both know who you are Greg. You arent fooling anyone. You think Id be scared to get in the face of some fatass brain dead dip**** who regularly lets his ass overload his mouth? Nope. But I wouldnt waste the money for a ticket on your dumbass. Ill let you come to me and then Ill introduce your front teeth (if you have any, toothless troglodyte comes to mind whenever I think of you)to the curb outside my house.

Do I sound even remotely interested in Jeanette? Do I really, after getting your panties in a wad over me saying he was overrated and after telling you that one of the few books I got rid of was that make believe Jeanette book that I really would be jealous that you have some old scrapbook that Jeanette kept which only has the most favorable articles about him in it all of which can easily be found with either an internet connection or a library card? Really? I wouldnt **** on your scrapbook if it were on fire.

 

We both know hes a liar. Like I said, he can go ahead and post from whatever he thinks is my list whatever he wants and I will immediately fire back and prove its not, he knows it so he is trying to redirect like he always does.

 

My reading about their bouts is that they were near mirror images like the first Jones - Hopkins bout .. it appears Johnson edged him and did score some flash knockdowns but every fight was very competitive .. how much of that is Johnson just doing enough to win I don't know.

 

There was also an inexcusably horrible insinuation made that should have someone banned for life. Karma.

 

I'm not saying he was better than Johnson at all .. I said Dempsey .. as far as Johnson everything I've read had their bouts razor close/extremely competitive.

 

klompton2LOL booohoo.
Strange reply, the manure has turned to diarrhea dont cry it's not manly.

No, the child is the one who gets jealous and butthurt over the fact that he cant have something he wants.

You have nothing I want, nothing at all maybe you are butthurt over the fact that I dont care what you have.

I can talk about it all day long, can you?

Yes I can, all day and some of the nite lol

Besides what Ive told you you had no idea about any of that because one of us has actually studied those subjects and the other would rather just play at being an actual historian.

Please I am confused who are you talking about? I never claimed to be a historian or wanting to be one. Anybody with internet can go into archives and find all the articles they crave. And for what I see from reading actual articles from the time you leave out relevant facts the shine a different light on things, you exaggerate, you DKSAB, you nitpick and cherry pick to support your manure agendas. A real historian gathers the facts and lays them out, they dont have to tell the reader what to think. I sure hope your book is different that what you post.

One of us went to school for the subject and the other didnt go to school at all.

Jeez what school did you go and what degree is "Historian", and can award a degree that makes you a "historian" on graduation?

Sorry chunky but the Marines isnt a school and its not exactly an exclusive club either.

What is it about the marines you dont like and what doess it have to do with anything?

Some of the smartest people I know were Marines but some the dumbest most socially maladjusted people are as well.

Let's change this statement to fit you. Some of the smartest people I know were true historians but some the dumbest most socially maladjusted people claim to be but are really pysstorians.

They dont exactly set the bar high, the military is after all the largest employer in the nation.
I guess the same, they set the bar real low for pysstorians like yourself.

just keep that in mind when you are trying to match wits with your betters and pretending that your service makes you anything special.

Go to a bar where there are people who actually served this country during a time of war and voice outloud your feelings about the military.
You seem to be the brave sort, haha

Im not bragging about what I HAVE, Im reiterating what I have DONE. Two different things. You seem to be the one fixated on what I have, like the child you mentioned above.

O yes you are, who are you trying to fool?

We both know who you are Greg. You arent fooling anyone.

Boy, the wax in your ears is interfering with your thinking I am not Greg. But you can call me Greg if you want to, if it helps you vent. Unlike you who hides under many alts, why would a prestigious pysstorian like yourself have to hide???

You think Id be scared to get in the face of some fatass brain dead dip**** who regularly lets his ass overload his mouth? Nope.

Yes I do talk is cheap, yep!

But I wouldnt waste the money for a ticket on your dumbass. Ill let you come to me and then Ill introduce your front teeth (if you have any, toothless troglodyte comes to mind whenever I think of you)to the curb outside my house.




Do I sound even remotely interested in Jeanette? Do I really, after getting your panties in a wad over me saying he was overrated and after telling you that one of the few books I got rid of was that make believe Jeanette book that I really would be jealous that you have some old scrapbook that Jeanette kept which only has the most favorable articles about him in it all of which can easily be found with either an internet connection or a library card? Really? I wouldnt **** on your scrapbook if it were on fire.[/QUOTE]

 

Um, post relevant facts that have a bearing on what you are stating. You know Jennette was inexperienced when the fought he was only a pro for a yr and a half when he traveled 15 rds with Johnson and had 58 fights while Jennette

Jennette turned pro 11/1904
First Johnson fight May of 1905 -Jennette was 0-3 coming in, Johnson at this time, been a pro 7 1/2 yrs and had 38 pro fights.

When Johnson and Jennette fought the 15 rdr, Jennette was a pro for 1yr and 4 months and had 18 pro fights Johnson had 58 pro fights. You also fail to mention that, that was Jennette's first 15rdr.

Perfect example of what you do, leave out relevant information to make a "point"

 

Crapper I am sorry I didnt finish commenting on your post. I will do so now>

Do I sound even remotely interested in Jeanette?

If you arent interested why are you posting?

Do I really, after getting your panties in a wad over me saying he was overrated

You are the one getting your panties in a wad cos over some guy you have a problem with, address me and comment on what I post, not some mystery guy that you are butt hurt over.

and after telling you that one of the few books I got rid of was that make believe Jeanette book

Again whatever the Jennette book the author has every right to publish, others may find it interesting. Since you done a copy n paste book no wonder you are in a tizzy, you lack the imagination and the writing skills to do so.

that I really would be jealous that you have some old scrapbook that Jeanette kept which only has the most favorable articles about him in it all of which can easily be found with either an internet connection or a library card?

same can be said of your copy n paste book

Really? I wouldnt **** on your scrapbook if it were on fire.

Ya see thats why you're a pysstorian haha

Dont you realize how petty you're being, who cares but you. Psst prof of foolishness, one of the best books on boxing, is a book of fiction, based on facts, 'The harder they Fall'. But of course it really cant compare with your copy n paste book. How much would you honestly say is the percentage of your original thoughts in your book, 2%-10%, as opposed to your C&P?
It might surprise you fiction books on boxing outsell non fiction books on boxing.
Let me end this by saying if this Jennette book is published, fiction or non-fiction, it's good for boxing. So be jealous cos thats what you are showing, professor Copy n paste, haha