Joshua v klitschko. :comparison s to holyfield V Holmes?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Fergy, Apr 30, 2017.


  1. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,555
    36,121
    Jan 8, 2017
    He did actually get a bit of flak for that fight as I remember. He'd been taken the distance by foreman, which in retrospect isn't a bad thing cos no one dropped him in his second career, but holmes had been destroyed by tyson. So going in to the fight he was expected to be impressive. I no holmes had a great chin but at that time because holmes had been ko by tyson the pressure was on holy to show what he could do. It was like you say, a solid work man like performance, but not what the public wanted to see. So in a way he didn't suddenly look as likely to be a great fighter as he turned out to be.
     
  2. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,555
    36,121
    Jan 8, 2017
    I'm not comparing the fighters career s as such , just the way that both holyfield and Holmes and Josh and klitschko are and were at similar points in their career s. Holmes had had his day but still had a lot to show, while holyfield was starting out and every performance was been judged. It remains tu be seen if Joshua can be half as good as the real deal.
     
  3. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    The problem for Holyfield was he had a lot of critics. He wasn't perfect but he got the job done.
    Holmes never actually came close to winning that fight, and that's really want counts.
    When Holyfield beat Douglas in 3 rounds everyone put that down to Douglas's poor condition and a lack of heart, few gave Holyfield much credit, so it seems he couldn't win with the critics.

    Tyson's win over Holmes was better than Holyfield's.
    But Tyson failed to beat Douglas, and Mercer failed to beat Holmes. Holyfield got the wins over both, so if the critics had taken time to look at it like that it doesn't really hurt Holyfield's credibility.
     
  4. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    I disagree. Holyfield wasn't starting out at all, in fact he was in the last stages of his prime years.
    Holyfield had done 15 rounds with Qawi, fought Tillman, Qawi again, Ocasio and Deleon at cruiser, unified all the cruiser belts, battered a past it Pinklon Thomas done an 10 round war with Dokes at heavyweight, KO'd Douglas in 3 for the undisputed title, beat Foreman over 12, etc.
     
  5. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    Joshua turned professional in October 2013, just 3 1/2 years ago.

    Holyfield was professional almost 8 years when he faced Holmes.
    In fact in his next fight, against Bowe, the story was if Holyfield could see off a young challenger or give way to the next generation.
    Holyfield had been campaigning tough fights at the top level for several years prior to facing Holmes and Bowe.
     
  6. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,555
    36,121
    Jan 8, 2017
    As a heavy weight champ in some ways he was new to the job, certainly not in fighting experience. The trouble back then was holy was attempting to escape from the shadow of tyson. We know how big tyson s name was at the time and he'd made that by spectacular ko's. But Douglas aside, we weren't getting that from holyfield. He was winning, yes , but not in the style that the public wanted. Same as Charles following Louis, he was fighting out of a shadow. But he did eventually, of course, show us a lot more than a few spectacular ko's.
     
  7. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,813
    44,474
    Apr 27, 2005
    Completely agree Fergy. The good news is suddenly Fury and Wilder want a piece of Joshua and even better news is that he is a guy that wants the big fights.
     
  8. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    The critics make unreasonable comparisons. Tyson was Tyson. Holyfield was Holyfield. The public prefered Tyson but they also liked Holyfield. Holyfield was one of boxing's stars at cruiserweight and maybe his achievements at heavyweight were being viewed too critically. Critics who attempted to make a big deal out of Holyfield winning Holyfield-style instead of Tyson-style cannot be placated. It's just silly.
    Sometimes commentators take an unreasonably critical position on a boxer. I doubt Joshua is getting that treatment. Wladimir got it worse than Holyfield even, and for more years. Even a prime Muhammad Ali had loads of critics.

    Holyfield had stopped everyone he'd fought at heavyweight apart from Foreman and Holmes. Many of his fights were reviewed as exciting. Fights we still talk about now. After Holmes, he stopped no one relevant until Tyson and Moorer in 1996 and 1997.

    Joshua is just starting out, like you said. Completely different to Holyfield.
    Holyfield might be somehow comparable to Wladimir in the sense that some of his critics started to accept him as a more special fighter when they saw him lose gallantly to Bowe. I see some people finally seeing Wlad's greatness more clearly because they saw him fight and lose the other night.
    That's just my take though.
     
  9. Jamal Perkins

    Jamal Perkins Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,701
    3,075
    Oct 19, 2012
    Holmes primary motivation was money. He didn't turn up in good shape against EH. He wasn't in the kind of shape he was in 1985-86. That's why he puked up vomit at the ring bell. He was drinking water like a fat out of shape guy during the fight.

    Wlad is a professional committed to the ring for his legacy not money like Holmes.

    Holmes would have done much better if he had got in shape and trained properly.

    In terms of age it was similar but not much else. Wlad was a whisker away from winning the title. One serious onslaught in rounds 7 and 8 would have done it but he began coasting.
    EH found larry a awkward troublesome guy but was never anywhere close to losing.
     
    Silly billy likes this.
  10. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,033
    Sep 5, 2004
    Wlad's condition and Larry's condition makes this a difficult comparison. Wlad still has more left in the tank at this stage than Larry did at his point; suffice to say that being a puncher tends to keep you in the game longer simply because having an equalizer can compensate for a lot of deficiencies.

    It was a different fight. A better comparison would be Marciano - Walcott.
     
  11. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,555
    36,121
    Jan 8, 2017
    Yep, Walcott and marciano is a good comparison. That was closer in regards action and kds than holmes v holy. The difference is that when I compared aj v klitschko to the holmes fight is that the older guy was challenging for the belt and gave the younger champ a harder than expected time. But I see your point. Walcott v rock had similar moments.
     
  12. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,555
    36,121
    Jan 8, 2017
    About time as well. At last the division is been talked about again. Aj in all the papers and even my wife s getting in to boxing now!
     
  13. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    It would be hard to find a comparable fight in heavyweight history.
    Joshua came into this fight VERY inexperienced.
    I expected Wladimir to win the fight although I didn't think it would be easy.
    I was suprised by how many expected it to be easy for Joshua.
     
  14. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,555
    36,121
    Jan 8, 2017
    Talking about it I meant, not actually starting to box lol
     
  15. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,555
    36,121
    Jan 8, 2017
    Quite a few, going by this forum expected a quick ko for Joshua.
     
    Big Ukrainian likes this.