Average Age of Heavyweight Champ Opponents

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mr.DagoWop, May 2, 2017.


  1. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Jack Dempsey - 28 years old

    Joe Louis - 27.5 years old

    Rocky Marciano - 29.8 years old

    Sonny Liston - 28.3 years old

    Muhammad Ali - 29.3 years old

    Joe Frazier - 27.6 years old

    George Foreman - 29.2 years old

    Larry Holmes - 28.5 years old

    Ken Norton - 28.7 years old

    Mike Tyson - 29.9 years old

    Evander Holyfield - 31.1 years old

    Lennox Lewis - 30.3 years old

    Riddick Bowe - 29.7 years old

    Wlad Klitschko - 32 years old

    Vitali Klitschko - 31.3 years old

    Anthony Joshua - 34.6 years old (entire resume) 31.5 years old (just top 6)

    Deontay Wilder - 35 years old


    For the guys with longer resumes I was liberal on who I added at first to the list of people I was averaging then once they started to fight notable opponents I was more conservative. I didn't put any "paid losers" or "bums" on the list. For early fights I just put guys who had decent records but they had a negligible effect as there were so little of them.

    Oldest Opponents: Wilder
    Youngest Opponents: Joe Louis

    Best Resume: Louis hands down Ali second
    Worst Resume: Wilder and Bowe

    I seriously recommend you guys to go through and try this on your own because it really gives a realistic view on how good of fighters that each champ fought throughout their career. Joe Louis was fighting good quality opponents practically his entire career and it really is amazing to see. I knew he had a strong resume and was moved along relatively fast but this raises my opinion of him and rating.

    I thought Dempsey would have a weaker resume so that was surprising as well.
     
    reznick likes this.
  2. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,490
    24,601
    Jun 26, 2009
    I don't think it's a fair calculation. Today's fighters, especially heavyweights, seem to be viable longer due to modern training and nutrition.

    Today's 35-year-old heavy is probably still viable and closer to peak than a guy of the same age in the 1930s or 50s or 70s, etc.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  3. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Lol it's fact. Undeniable fact. The truth. Logic. Undisprovable.

    If you have facts of your own that you would like to debate then I will be more than happy to.
     
    Saintpat likes this.
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,065
    27,868
    Jun 2, 2006
    I know one champ defended against both a 38 years old challenger ,and a 40 years old one.
     
  5. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,261
    Sep 5, 2011
    Mr. Dagowop
    You did not explain exactly what this age comparison means, but I get impression you think there is a connection between youth and the quality of opposition. Certainly it is almost a cliché to list age as a way of putting down a fighter's opposition.

    The irony is that the very opposite is true. If an older fighter is in the ring with a champion, he is a dangerous fighter. Who was Jeffries' most dangerous championship opponent. The young guys Sharkey, Ruhlin, and Munroe? Or old Fitz? Who was Tunney's most dangerous championship opponent? Heeney? Or old Dempsey? What about Louis? Except for Conn, almost certainly the two oldest, Schmeling and Walcott. Charles oldest opponent was Walcott and we know where that went. Who thinks LaStarza and Don C were tougher than Walcott and Moore? The oldest guy Patterson defended against was Liston. And then there's Foreman and old Ali. And what about Vitali and old Lewis?

    The "he beat old men" is probably the single biggest fallacy common in boxing analysis.

    A young challenger is often someone who hasn't accomplished much and never will.
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2017
  6. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,490
    24,601
    Jun 26, 2009
    I'd say look at just their title fights. You arbitrarily left off some opponents by your own admission, so it's not "undeniable fact," it's selective. Who you left off or put on could skew it either way.
     
  7. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,490
    24,601
    Jun 26, 2009
    Is that Holyfield vs. Foreman and Holmes? Just shows how data can appear to show one thing when the truth is another -- both were more viable and deserving than a lot of younger guys.

    Povetkin as WBA regular champ had a couple of defenses against OLD men who were completely undeserving, to contrast.

    Wasn't it Mark Twain who said there are "lies, damned lies and statistics"???
     
  8. Flash24

    Flash24 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,287
    9,072
    Oct 22, 2015
    Maybe I'm not understanding what your getting at, But, your saying Louis had the best competition "Hands Down". But on your own list that you created Ali defeated 4 fighters and Louis defeated none. Maybe I'm not understanding your point. And theirs been thousands of 3rd rate fighters over the years in their early twenties. Don't see any connection.
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2017
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,065
    27,868
    Jun 2, 2006
    No,Marciano against Walcott and Moore,just rattling Dago's cage really.
     
  10. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,026
    Sep 22, 2010
    no
     
  11. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,026
    Sep 22, 2010
    the average age SHOULD be in the 20s if you are facing cream of the crop, as with any cardio sport. these resumes stacked with late 30somethings are a sign of the stagnation in boxing recently- essentiall they are taking the mick from their supporters by fighting so many no hopers.
     
    Reinhardt likes this.
  12. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    That's a lie. I said I left off the "bums" and "paid losers" the type of guys that fighters fight in their first 5-10 fights. They are meaningless.
     
  13. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Yep. And obviously other later champs defended against guys who were in their mid to late 40s.
     
  14. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Where on this list do I say that Ali defeated 4 fighters and Louis defeated none? I only referred to age of opponents on here not who they fought.

    I didn't add third rate fighters.

    I only added:
    -Prior to fighting a big name I added a few ( less than 5) decent fighters which records for example of 15-3. That was for the guys with longer resumes. Ex: Donnie Long on Tyson's resume.
    -After fighting a big name I only added guys who were top contenders/champions

    After they started stepping up in competition the expectations got higher. I DIDN'T put anyone of the lower class guys on the list if they would skew the data negatively. Regardless of who's list it was. The same standards I used for Bowe I used for Dempsey and Marciano.
     
  15. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    I'll use Mike Tyson for example.

    Prior to winning the title: Long, Scaff, Jaco, Jameson, Ferguson, Zouski, Tillis, Green, Gross, Boyd, Frazier, Ribalta, Ratliff

    After: Everyone from Berbick onward.

    Let's say Tyson fought Scaff after winning the title for some odd reason. He would NOT have gone on the list.

    Again, this is used to give a picture of the average age that each champs opponents were throughout their career. Not just their title run.