The Rings Top 20 2017 All Time Heavyweights!

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Apr 15, 2017.


  1. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,261
    Sep 5, 2011
    I think Wills was American, from New Orleans. Vitaly is on the list. So you think Burns and Johansson really should be on a top 20 list?

    Jackson sometimes is put on such lists, but is like Sullivan. Who can really make a good judgment from way back there in the 1880's.

    Thanks for the reply.
     
  2. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    60,875
    23,237
    Jul 21, 2012
    But i did John , i did. Look closer :sherlock:
     
  3. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,370
    8,770
    Oct 8, 2013
    First off you keep quoting the Ring poll you do know I actually moved Lewis up from their poll. They don't have him In the top 10 I do. So I actually rate him higher than the Ring experts. Instead of acknowledging that your fixated on fact I moved Wlad over him.
    I'm going with Wlad's consistency and dominant reign which falls in line with my other top picks. Often when you have a dominant champ his competition becomes undersold, it's true of Holmes, Louis, Wlad.
    Look it's not an exact science I'm valueing Wlad's run of 10 years of facing all challengers many Prime peak fighters some very good some not good, over Lewis who fought more recognizable names but made fewer than half the defenses Wlad had simple as that. Wlad's competition is sold short and coupled with his longevity he rates where he does. Like my other top picks.
     
  4. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,599
    43,936
    Apr 27, 2005
    I see no mention of "Ring" in the original post i quoted.
     
  5. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,474
    9,463
    Jun 9, 2010
    I agree with this (particularly that in the bold text).

    Essentially, Wlad never fought his biggest competitive rival (regardless of the reasons).

    I think Wlad will dine out on the longevity of his reign to establish him in the Top-20, as far as an ATG rating goes. However and somewhat sadly, it is quite likely his most talked about fights will be those he lost.

    Lewis has significantly more rounded justification for a high position in the Top-10.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,655
    28,952
    Jun 2, 2006
    Carpentier was not a mandatory. My point which went over your head, is neither Carpentier or Loughran were heavyweights when Tunney fought them.Carpentier was 2 lbs inside the light heavyweight limit, Loughran19 years old was only 163lbs!What he did later has no relevance to what he was when he fought Tunney which was a middleweight !
    Loughran fought Tunney in 1922 ,he didn't fight a heavyweight until 4 years later,and he NEVER fought Schmeling!


    So including them as on Tunney's resume is a sign of at best ignorance, and at worst dishonesty. Hard to tell with you!
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2017
  7. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,655
    4,380
    Jul 14, 2009
    I have no problem with the RING placing Lewis at 11th place. I am not a fanboy by no means.

    I notice how you want to place Wlad's reign on an equal foorage with Holmes. Holmes actually had tough challenger and exciting fights. Off the top of my head Norton, Witherspoon, Cooney, Shavers, Williams, Spinks come to my mind. Holmes was not knocked out during his reign. He lost two disputed decisions to the best light heavy of all time (most thought he won the 2nd fight). He was not completely outboxed by a clown like Fury

    Go and actually watch some of Holmes fights (for example his war with Weaver) and judge for yourself. Larry had such a tough time because he came after Ali.
     
  8. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,370
    8,770
    Oct 8, 2013
    I happen to respect Holmes a ton and have met him several times. I rate Holmes over Wlad on the list but Holmes is not without flaws he dropped belts to avoid challenges and was awarded new belt (ibf) without fighting for it, Wlad faced all comers. Holmes also took fights with guys that made there name by giving him a tough bout when they weren't expected to like 15-0 Witherspoon. A "clown" like Fury you do realize Wlad was 39 when he fought Fury. I don't like Fury but I wouldn't besmirch his skills. Norton, shavers, Cooney, Witherspoon, all great names but not widely more impressive than Byrd, Povetkin, Haye, Chagaev, Peter. Yes Holmes was more exciting many champs were more exciting than Wlad, I wouldn't argue that point but that's not a criteria for my placement. Also part of the reason Wlad wasn't exciting was because he was so dominant. We finally saw him pushed at age 41 in a tremendously fun action fight.
     
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,599
    43,936
    Apr 27, 2005
    :icon_popcorn:
     
  10. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,261
    Sep 5, 2011
    this thread caused me to think so much about it, so I am posting my current top 20 list

    1-----Muhammad Ali
    2-----Joe Louis
    3-----Rocky Marciano
    4-----Lennox Lewis
    5-----Larry Holmes
    6-----Jack Johnson
    7-----Wlad Klitschko
    8-----Evander Holyfield
    9-----Jim Jeffries
    10----George Foreman

    11----Mike Tyson
    12----Joe Frazier
    13----Sonny Liston
    14----Jack Dempsey & Harry Wills (tie)
    16----Max Schmeling
    17----Vitali Klitschko
    18----Ken Norton
    19----Ezzard Charles
    20----Sam Langford




    I think the fairest way concerning Dempsey & Wills is to give them equal rating. I left Sullivan out because he is really pre-modern. If he is in, some of the old London Prize Ring Rules champions like Tom Cribb should be on the list also.
     
    Last edited: May 5, 2017
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,655
    28,952
    Jun 2, 2006
    Did Cribb , whose relation and namesake used to be my Dad's drinking partner, ever fight with gloves?
    You've included Wills who never held the title , but its your list so that's your prerogative. Neither Jeffries or Marciano make my top ten,Wlad has just displaced Marciano and Jeffries hasn't featured on it since I was a teen.

    But I place a lot of emphasis on H2H.Still a very interesting crew.
     
  12. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,261
    Sep 5, 2011
    on Wills. Pretty difficult to be "champion" if the champions will not get in the ring with you. With the color line drawn, I think the colored champions deserve to be considered champions. Just my viewpoint.
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,655
    28,952
    Jun 2, 2006
    I see what you are proposing but several fighters,some of different hues did not get a chance to fight for the title should we automatically assume they are of championship calibre.
    Can we in all conscience call Larry Gains a Champion ? Denver Ed Martin? George Godfrey? Sam McVey,Joe Jeannette,Sam Langford?
    How about the lighter men, the Murderers Row? Do you consider them champions or are you making an exception for Wills because he was a," cause celebre?" I'm not trying to be awkward,I'm genuinely interested in your rationale here.
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,655
    28,952
    Jun 2, 2006
    Carpentier was never a ranked heavyweight either in 1924 when the ratings began or any time after. In fact in 1924 Loughran was rated number 9 at light heavy! As I've explained to you, Loughran was a 19 years old 163lbs middleweight when he faced Tunney in1922 he did not fight a heavyweight until 1927 ,5 years later!
    Therefore he was not, by any stretch of the imagination a heavyweight in 1922! So that is two men that Tunney fought who were not heavyweights, just as Mickey Walker was not a heavyweight when he fought Jack Sharkey in 1931! Show me ONE POSTER who agrees with you that 163lbs Loughran and173lbs Carpentier were heavyweights when they fought Tunney!
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,655
    28,952
    Jun 2, 2006
    If a light heavyweight fights a heavyweight and his own weight is inside the lhy limit he is a lightheavyweight by very definition! EG.Walker was 174lbs for the Schmeling fight ie a lhvy not a heavy!

    NB Tunney was 173lbs for Loughran and 173.25lbs for Carpentier so on neither count could the fights be counted as:
    1.Heavyweight fights 2.fights between a heavyweight and another!
    So please cut out the cr*p!
     
    Last edited: May 4, 2017