Has there been a worse exaggeration than "Brook exposed Golovkin?"

How can you expose someone who beats you by TKO. GGG wasnt interested in winning rounds he was interested in getting the KO fullstop. Although I do believe GGG is hyped up to some degree and was exposed by Jacobs but having said that we dont know how great Jacobs my prove to be yet.

 

Selective selection, know what that is ???
Facts, ggg would fight ANY of the PPV fighters from 154-168, why must you leave out the only stipulation ???
Nothing but trolling and a pathetic attempt. Up your game kid

 

Yeah, the British heavies can fight. Only AJ can fight.

 

"Tyson struggled with Spinks ?"

 

If he were a mw he'd lose the only advantage he had in speed, you can't claim such stupidity thinking it's Apple's to Apple's. The reason he was able to land those very minimal clean shots was because he's ww.

 

Ali never beat such a dominant and such a long reigned champ, did he ?

 

Brook can make welter, Golovkin can't. Golovkin is the bigger man. Anyone can gain weight.

 

Huh? I put three other exaggerations, you only have one excuse.

 

Oh, he only landed on Golovkin because he was a WW. Makes perfect sense, what a boxing guru you are!! Thank GOD he wasn't a MW, otherwise he would have never landed ANYTHING, and would have likely been killed n the ring.

GTFO! Youe fanboyism is out of this world.

 

Brook won 2 rounds, this isn't something new. Monroe won a round or two, so have some other fighters. Brook as well as other fighters have been able to capitalize on Golovkin's lack of head-movement, nothing new. Brook still got his skull-cracked like the rest.

 

George Foreman wasn't dominant? Joe Fraizer wasn't dominant? Comparing Joshua to Ali when all he has done is defeat one hall of famer who is past his prime is ludicrous. GTFO of here if you think Joshua's achievements so far stack up to Ali's