Better All-Around Fighter: Primo Carnera or Riddick Bowe?

I didn't say it did. I just found it funny and strange.

 

Carnera was getting sued left and right for very trivial things.
Every other article is a court appearance.

 

What is derogatory about that ? Louis gave his honest opinion,an opinion he forcefully reiterated later in his autobiography.The piece gives Carnera his p o v,without commernt,it could have just as easily and truthfully said at no time was Louis bothered by Carnera's punches but it didn't.
You're proving my point and all I have to to do is read what you are providing.You've posted nothing derogatory about Carnera that was printed whilst he was an active fighter.
Unless you can produce a derogatory smear piece that was printed during his boxing career,your argument collapses by default

 

NYT: Louis Hitting Impresses Wear
http://imgur.com/a/cvcom

 

Who are the revisionists?

Clearly not the people who listen to his opponents, and potential opponents!

 

I'm not saying these are derogatory.
I hate to say this but you seem paranoid.
I'm simply going through Carnera articles from the Times archives, and doing a dump of noteworthy selections.
You are way off the mark on my intentions. Way way off.
Most of these are complimentary to Primo, which I explained before I started posting these excerpts.

Didn't you already post derogatory pieces by Gallico?

 

Baer Visits Carnera
http://imgur.com/a/Kx5Sc

"Baer made it a special point to reveal that his pre battle statements minimizing Carnera's ability were not meant seriously and were intended only as ballyhoo."

 

Carnera is Victor By Knockout In 3rd (1930)
http://imgur.com/a/Kx5Sc

 

Nothing negative there ,why post it?

 

I've asked for evidence of all the bias against Carnera you say the press showed .You haven't produced a single line yet!

 

I didn't oblige your request.
Less you think people should be able to make demands of others at their whim, I ask you to produce a million dollars for me!

I'll get to the other archives soon...

 

You've paid for a subscription, that you hope will provide the necessary proof to prove your argument.Yet you were confident enough to state earlier ,[several times] that Carnera suffered from anti Italian bias and negative news reportage.You've so far found f*ck all ,and are now reduced to paying for information,well good luck!
We await the results! As always the burden of proof is on you!

 

Carnera sent the NYT a note when leaving the country, thanking them for being fair to him.

If I had this agenda you speak of, I wouldn't be posting these articles.

 

I didn't accuse you of having an agenda ,I just think you are badly misinformed. I await the negative reports you continually referred to.

 

NYT: British Humor (1929)
http://imgur.com/a/E9cQh

Da Preem being drastically underrated here?
Due to his size and nationality?