Better All-Around Fighter: Primo Carnera or Riddick Bowe?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mrkoolkevin, Apr 23, 2017.


Who was the better all-around fighter, Primo Carnera or Riddick Bowe?

  1. Primo Carnera

  2. Riddick Bowe

  3. They were equally good all-around fighters

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,556
    27,181
    Feb 15, 2006
    You seem to be claiming some kind of moral victory based on the fact that the majority opinion at the start of the debate is still the majority opinion.

    If you are confident in the strength of your arguments then they should speak for themselves.
     
    reznick and choklab like this.
  2. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,632
    9,771
    Jun 9, 2010
    Indeed - that's massive. If something like that happened today, the little guy would be owned by the medical science community.

    And, while I am not a huge fan of Vitali, the man was virtually impossible to put down, as a professional boxer. I think Sanders looked the most likely to do it, weighing in at 235 to Vitali's 245.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,721
    29,069
    Jun 2, 2006
    Personally speaking, I'm very confident they have!
    A slimmer ,younger, Primo being fondled .

    This content is protected
     
    Last edited: May 19, 2017
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,556
    27,181
    Feb 15, 2006
    Then why don’t you just say:

    "Thank you for your contribution gentlemen, we have laid out the arguments, and it is up to people to make their minds up".

    Or just say nothing serene in the knowledge that nobody is likely to be influenced by what we have written.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,721
    29,069
    Jun 2, 2006
    Vitali had a top chin no doubt about it.
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,556
    27,181
    Feb 15, 2006
    Young Stribling would have bulked up to 210lbs today, if not more.

    Hard to say what exactly, but he certainly wouldn’t have fought Fury at 195.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,721
    29,069
    Jun 2, 2006
    I've already stated I don't think anyone has been influenced by anything I have posted and I don't see any new adherents flocking to your banner.
    This is not my thread so its not for me to call time on it, it can run into perpetuity for all I care.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,721
    29,069
    Jun 2, 2006
    We are discussing the 195lbsStribling that knocked Carnera down ,not some hypothetical version.
    You find it," hard to say",what the reaction of the press would be if a 195lbs fighter knocked down Joshua?
    I don't!
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  9. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,653
    Dec 31, 2009
    Is this another one of your erotic fantasys?
     
  10. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,653
    Dec 31, 2009
    The thought of Mcvey being "serene" in his knowledge of something is quite amusing.
     
    reznick and janitor like this.
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,556
    27,181
    Feb 15, 2006
    For practical purposes there is nothing between 199lbs and 210lbs at the weigh in today. You either bulk up to 210 or stay at cruiser. So I think we can take Cunningham’s KD of Fury as being the modern equivalent. Yes he would be criticised for it, but perhaps the criticism would be too severe?
     
    reznick and choklab like this.
  12. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,632
    9,771
    Jun 9, 2010
    Regardless of the vote, I think you need to understand what trying to argue from behind really means. Attempting to turn an historical outlook on a particular sporting individual on its head, some 80 or so years later, would need a substantial input of new data.

    There is really very little new data. Almost all of the 'new information' is revised opinions on existing data. These opinions have been addressed and your arguments dismantled, repeatedly.

    I think enormous tolerance has been shown by the majority, much more than perhaps would have been shown in other debating circles, in the face of some fairly absurd argumentation; dismissive attitudes to known data, as well as some pretty foul use of historical quotations by some.

    Oh - and I am writing this, ever so serenely.
     
    BlackCloud likes this.
  13. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,632
    9,771
    Jun 9, 2010
    Me neither. I wonder if it takes a special set of welding goggles to avoid certain glaringly obvious points.
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,556
    27,181
    Feb 15, 2006
    Well I am off up to the Lake District for the weekend, where there will be no oversized Italian heavyweights to vex me.

    Have a good weekend everyone!
     
    reznick, JohnThomas1 and choklab like this.
  15. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,653
    Dec 31, 2009
    Uzcudun remained high profile, in back to back fights he fought Carnera, Schmeling x2 and Louis in back to back fights. Paulino lost to Primo then drew with Schmeling in his next fight!
    yes, 17-5-1 of the recorded fights? Campolo beat Arturo Godoy. Are you now going to say Godoy was too small? Joshua first 17 opponents were a lot less known than campolo was, and the knockout is legit.

    why would there be? If Campolo was around now he would be no better and have a 30-0 record. Charles Martin wound up with a belt in Joshua's day.
    I'm giving credit for his going 15 rounds at a good pace at 260lbs. For fighting well in a losing effort against a more seasoned Sharkey.

    that's just an interesting tidbit. Marciano and Ali complained of being blinded in world title fights. they remain interesting tidbits. That's all.

    the being outclassed part is not the impressive part. The impressive part was that he was boxing at a high level. Chuvalo going the distance with Ali and losing, Berbick going the distance with Holmes and losing. Foreman going the distance with Holyfield and losing. Bugner going the distance with Frazier and losing. That kind of thing.

    those fights are absolute poundings that should have been stopped. Carnera was in no danger of being stopped by Sharkey.
     
    reznick likes this.