Golovkin is no Mayweather or Cotto he will show you the golf difference on sep 16!

Ggg isn't a draw he doesn't offer lotto ticket paydays like pbf nor is he seen as the best

 

You're right. He very likely would kill Floyd

 

Dammit, you're right again. Golovkin has to pay his opponents MORE than they'd normally get just to entice them into the ring. Even JACOBS, who was MANDATORY, had to be paid EXTRA for him to take his mando shot. When the F has that ever happened before?

He is, however, by far the best in his division.

 

Best of a garbage division isn't saying much.

 

Divisions are always "garbage" when a dominant champion is around.

 

GGG has one of the weakest resume's for any top fighter. ONE, just ONE division he fights in.. ive never seen a fighter so scared to move up in weight to challenge himself... he only fights smaller fighters moving up in weight.
Why would an elite fighter stay in one of the weakest divisions just so he can feast on smaller bums? The one time he fought a guy his own size he nearly lost, (Jacobs)

 

Kinda like with pbf in this era since pbf dominated it through 5 different weightclasses.

 

I'm amazed that people think that 160 is a better division than 168

Jacobs is considered the 2nd best in the division and I'm sure he would lose badly to Jack/Groves/DeGale

 

and jack/groves/degale would lose to kovalev... whats the point?

 

Point is no one says that 168 is better than 175, but yet LOTS of people on here think that 160 is better than 168.

That's my point, thought it was pretty obvious.

 

i see, and why dont people say 175 is better?

 

People do say 175 is better, it's a very strong division.

 

Then it's a good thing that wasn't what I was doing. My post is simply about how that distinction is more watered down then dive bar vodka.

 

at least for those of us who don't know how to use emojis, this just seems like showing off

 

gulf.