Is Tyson clearly hurt?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by The Kentucky Cobra, Jun 2, 2017.


Is Tyson

Poll closed Jun 2, 2017.
  1. Clearly Lands to Head, Clearly Hurt

    7 vote(s)
    50.0%
  2. Clearly Lands to Head, Not Clearly Hurt

    5 vote(s)
    35.7%
  3. Neither Clear

    2 vote(s)
    14.3%
  1. The Kentucky Cobra

    The Kentucky Cobra Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,576
    2,517
    Jan 9, 2017
    If it did, I wouldn't know.

    " But Tyson seemed actually dazed and flinched and went back. Tyson wasn't the type of fighter to back up unless he was hurt, even when he got his feet muddled a bit."

    I don't think he was dazed as he had presence of mind to slip Evander's left hook and try to pivot with him, he did flinch.

    I can't think of a comparable instance where a guy spun around him like that. I would imagine Tyson felt vulnerable with his opponent almost completely behind him.
     
  2. The Kentucky Cobra

    The Kentucky Cobra Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,576
    2,517
    Jan 9, 2017
    If it did, I wouldn't know.

    " But Tyson seemed actually dazed and flinched and went back. Tyson wasn't the type of fighter to back up unless he was hurt, even when he got his feet muddled a bit."

    I don't think he was dazed as he had presence of mind to slip Evander's left hook and try to pivot with him, he did flinch.

    I can't think of a comparable instance where a guy spun around him like that. I would imagine Tyson felt vulnerable with his opponent almost completely behind him.
     
  3. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    So what's your position ?
    What poll option is your position ?
     
  4. The Kentucky Cobra

    The Kentucky Cobra Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,576
    2,517
    Jan 9, 2017
    Neither clearly hit or hurt Mike.
     
  5. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    OK.
    At times it seems like your arguing that Tyson was clearly not hurt, which is different to saying he's not clearly hurt.

    Or maybe I misunderstood. (perhaps you also said the punch clearly does not land cleanly)

    I think nothing is clear. :lol:

    Except for the fact Holyfield boxed Tyson's socks off ... but we all know that anyway.
     
    The Kentucky Cobra likes this.
  6. The Kentucky Cobra

    The Kentucky Cobra Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,576
    2,517
    Jan 9, 2017
    I see no visual evidence of him being hurt, so it not clear. lol I suppose that's the best way of wording it. I don't know, I got pushed into making this poll, I wasn't sure the best way to approach it. I'm not a fan of polls and I don't think they resolve much. I realized the wording sucked but I couldn't change it.

    No, I don't think it's a clear punch or a clear instance of Mike being hurt. Nobody can decide where this punch actually landed and there just isn't no evidence of Mike reacting to it.

    Yes, Evander boxed his socks off. He was too good in the pocket. The point I was making over and over is Evander wasn't Ruddock. Ruddock would throw a bomb and hit or miss, he would just admire his work, letting Tyson wallop him. Evander would spin out of the way, or Dempsey roll into another punch, or keep his hands tight, so even when he missed, Tyson couldn't counter.

    And I'm glad you see that, I found common ground with one person, best you can hope for.
     
    Legend X likes this.
  7. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    I can see where your coming from but I see the sense in the opposing side too.
    I mean, if we break every fight or every moment of a fight down into small clips things don't always become clearer anyway.
    It's never going to be easy to distinguish a fighter being hurt from a fighter being confused by skill, in many instances, when we break it down. We can't ever know.
    So sometimes it might be best to stick with the first instincts, when we watch the entire fight or round, for full context.
    I tend to believe a lot of unspectacular punches hurt anyway.

    I think Tyson's punch resistance was very good in 1996 but he didn't see those punches coming, he didn't anticipate such intelligent aggression.

    Yeah, I agree with your points about Ruddock and Holyfield.
    Ruddock took 19 rounds of pain against Tyson and never once seemed to understand he wasn't going to do what he did with Dokes !
    Ruddock wasted his talent relying on the one-arm-KO style. I don't know if he ever had enough skill to beat Tyson but he didn't even try to box much at all.