Modern Day Super-Heavys that defeat Holmes of 1978 ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Unforgiven, Jun 25, 2017.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,654
    28,942
    Jun 2, 2006
    Id give Lewis the best chance, followed by Bowe.I think I'd pick Larry against both though.
     
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  2. andrewa1

    andrewa1 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,005
    2,071
    Apr 8, 2013
    Wow, the nostalgia is strong in this thread. Lewis, both Ks, Bowe, and probably Fury and Joshua would take any version of Holmes. Most likely more than them, as well. Holmes struggled against the best, biggest, tallest fighters he faced. Cooney and Williams were probably the best 6'4 or taller fighters he faced and he barely beat them.

    Dominant HW champs are generally either bigger than most of their peers or harder hitting. Holmes was somewhat bigger and harder hitting than his peers, but that advantage would be gone now. He would not be suited to the modern advances. He'd be outjabbed (he was by Cooney and Williams, imagine what the others would do to him) and broken down. Holmes was very lucky it was a weak era when he dominated and that Stevenson never turned pro.
     
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,596
    43,925
    Apr 27, 2005
    After rewatching Holmes - Shavers 2 recently i'd go with Lewis tbh. Holmes was more of a clubbing type puncher and most stoppages were due to accumulation. I think Lewis' height reach and right hand would put him in great stead. Shavers would have stopped Larry imo if he was a bit better fighter/finisher. His efforts were terrible immediately following the kd.
     
  4. Birmingham

    Birmingham Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,075
    6,786
    Jan 13, 2017
    I agree. Bowe of form would be a nightmare for Holmes. Both at their best is agreat fight imo...Lewis on the other hand imo could be Holmes worst h2h match up. Good jab, monster right hand, physically stronger and cute with it. Plus a natural 2 stone heavier. Holmes is a strong puncher, but he tends to wear you down instead of having 1 punch ko power, so Lewis isn't in danger of getting ko'd.
     
  5. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,924
    18,900
    Oct 4, 2016
    Holmes beats all of them, KO's Wlad , UD over the rest
     
    SluggerBrawler and ticar like this.
  6. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,527
    Apr 26, 2015
    Holmes did drop his jab but so did all the aforementioned fighters. Prime Holmes jab was so good it was a very difficult punch to counter. He beats all the aforementioned fighters due to his dominant jab. He gets it going and opponents just cannot mount a consistent offense of their own.
     
  7. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,596
    43,925
    Apr 27, 2005
    Holmes dropping his jab is going to be more dangerous against bigger, taller fighters with more reach. They will be in better punching range when that jab is dropped.
     
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,033
    45,276
    Feb 11, 2005
    His jab wasn't as versatile or powerful as Wlad's. He isn't out jabbing him.
     
  9. JackSilver

    JackSilver Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,039
    4,860
    Jun 24, 2017
    Shavers and Snipes weren't particularly taller or with long reaches though. The fight with Tyson can be excused since Holmes was long past his best and Tyson had extremely fast hands.
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2017
  10. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,596
    43,925
    Apr 27, 2005
    Were? Weren't? I'm confused.

    I'm not saying one has to be tall to give Holmes problems or to take advantage of the jab taken back low. I am saying however for top class fighters such size and reach will indeed come in handy and could make all the difference.

    Larry is a great fighter and would beat plenty of ATG's. He's become somewhat overrated however which can be seen in the almost automated responses to so many threads. He struggled against the likes of Snipes, Weaver, Witherspoon (little past prime here) and Shavers at times (going life and death here and there) yet he outboxes so many ATG's in fantasy matches often with nary a worry.

    Loads of average to good fighters got around his jab to trouble him greatly. He has no top tier wins, never beating an ATG. He's not waltzing past the likes of Lewis, Bowe and the two Klits imo. At the very least he struggles in all these matches at times and would with the likes of Holyfield, Tyson and co as well for mine.

    Great fighter but no certainty over various other (a great many more proven) ATG's.
     
    andrewa1 likes this.
  11. JackSilver

    JackSilver Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,039
    4,860
    Jun 24, 2017
    Sorry dude, that should have been weren't. I'm gonna edit it now.
     
  12. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,649
    Dec 31, 2009
    I don't know how many people here have seen the full Larry Holmes vs Roy Tiger Williams, but I believe it is an important fight worth watching before deciding how Larry copes with Super Heavyweights.

    This content is protected
     
  13. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,028
    Sep 22, 2010
    There were dozens of fighters in holmes time who could have qualified as SHWs but they weren't stupid enough to gain weight to that extent, as it would have ruined their boxing ability.
     
    SluggerBrawler likes this.
  14. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,649
    Dec 31, 2009
    Exactly. Cooney, Tex Cobb and Truth Williams could easily have been heavier, but it was not thought that it would have improved anything in those days.

    Roy Tiger Williams and LeRoy Jones (who Larry fought) really were every bit the Super Heavyweight we have nowadays. And possibly just as good.
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2017
  15. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,565
    Nov 24, 2005
    Holmes would school most of them.