Modern Day Super-Heavys that defeat Holmes of 1978 ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Unforgiven, Jun 25, 2017.


  1. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,672
    7,633
    Dec 31, 2009
    I agree.

    The dependence on size among super heavyweights means that reach is a very much a more important factor. Often when size cannot make the difference it boils down to who has the longest arms. well Larry had long enough arms for any fighter to wish to have. So when it comes down to that factor, at the most base and primitive level Larry already measures up. Throw out that ace in the sleeve.

    Put that together with an excellent long range game and a high punch output ratio, foot placement, punch selection and I really cannot think what the biggest guys can do against Larry.

    The way Bruno outboxed Lennox Lewis makes me think how well Larry would do against him, and that's the SHW goat isn't it?

    For those that say Lewis was better Under Manny Steward, well I can still remember how the pace of a much lighter Mavrovic really unsettled Lennox. I don't think it takes much imagination to replace Mavrovic that night with Larry Holmes and envision that scenario.

    This is not to say Lennox Lewis is not great and would not trouble Larry at all. I think Lennox still represents a greater challenge than any fighter Larry fought, it's just that when you look at all the attributes and capabilities of both there really isn't anything on its own that outranks Larry.

    To make size count you have to really draw the smaller man into a physical fight. But that's hard to do if the lighter man boxes tall and long and has a greater work rate.

    Larry is a match for range, he's more than a match for durability plus Larry has a huge edge in pace and fluency.
     
    lloydturnip likes this.
  2. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    60,197
    22,305
    Jul 21, 2012
    I don't remember him going life n death with Shavers. Those fights were shuts outs minus a knockdown
     
    SluggerBrawler and Pat M like this.
  3. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,573
    4,318
    Jul 14, 2009
    Actually he was an excellent inside fighter.Could throw the uppercut from long range, as weaver found out.Good combination puncher, excellent left jab, excellent 1-2. i take your point that he was not a left hook artist but that its about it.
     
    SluggerBrawler likes this.
  4. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,573
    4,318
    Jul 14, 2009
    His jab was sharper and more powerful than wlad's
     
    Reason123 and lloydturnip like this.
  5. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    59,522
    42,732
    Feb 11, 2005
    It was not more powerful... and it was not more versatile. Wlad used his jab as a change up, so speed and sharpness varied.
     
  6. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    51,660
    41,913
    Apr 27, 2005

    When he was knocked down it was a life and death situation. He was probably a clean punch from being gone.
     
  7. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,524
    Apr 26, 2015
    Wlad is just too tentative in the ring always worried about that one blow he knows he can't take. His tentativeness allows Holmes to outjab him in bunches especially at angles. As typical with Larry once he gets that jab going his right won't be long for Wlad very vulnerable chin. This would be a beat down over 5-7 rounds before a right hand forces the ref to stop a one sided fight. Holmes KO 7.
     
  8. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,026
    Sep 22, 2010
    so why didnt it happen if it was that clearcut?
     
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    51,660
    41,913
    Apr 27, 2005
    What sort of a silly question is that?
     
  10. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,026
    Sep 22, 2010
    ITS YOU who seems to think it was a edge away from happenning.

    The ONUS is on YOU to explain why it didnt, because it didnt.

    Certainly dont ask me to support YOUR view.
     
  11. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    51,660
    41,913
    Apr 27, 2005
    The onus isn't on me to do sweet fa. The situation is obvious on film to me. If you disagree so be it.
     
  12. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,026
    Sep 22, 2010
    you've claimed holmes was on the edge of being sparked when he was floored, an almost sure thing to be lights out.

    So why wasnt he on each occasion if you tihnk it was such a surefire thing? 2nd time I've asked you.

    defend your point of view with evidence of holmes getting ktfo in similar situations. Or admit that you cant defend your position. Or just pretend it isnt happening, i gues thats an option too.
     
  13. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    51,660
    41,913
    Apr 27, 2005
    What i said was "He was probably a clean punch from being gone." Dramatise it all you want but i personally believe this to be the case and you are most welcome to differ.


    Wtf? Who is talking on each occasion? I am talking this specific round of this specific fight.

    I don't need to defend sweet fa. Second time i've told you. No situation is ever the same. It's on film people can make their own opinion on it.
     
  14. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,026
    Sep 22, 2010
    ok I just want you to add substance to your view with evidence.

    if you choose not to defend your view, then it remains unbased.
     
  15. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,524
    Apr 26, 2015
    I watched both fights live. Boring, one sided, affairs aside from one right hand by Shavers. I don't think he won any other round. In reality Holmes being decked by that Herculean right from one of its all time punchers, getting up and winning ADDS to his ATG credentials.