If Crawford beats Indongo...

Hell no. He's beaten no one. Indongo is a nobody. I like Crawford, but his resume is trash because that's all there is to fight in his division. Same as GGG. The same guys that **** on GGG love Crawford though. It's why their opinions are worth less than a pile of ****.

 

Took the undefeated of Postol, the undefeated of Gamboa, arguably the undefeated of Diaz (his only loss was controversial) and now is going for the undisputed title, the first in more than then years.
Yes, he will be my p4p #1.
I have Ward, Loma and GGG up there, but Loma is facing Marriaga (I respected that he got the title shot against Valdez, but he doesn't deserves another crack yet, it doesn't brings anything to Loma's resume), GGG is in a tough one against Canelo and Ward while the clear #1 so far, it can changes.
The winner of GGG vs Canelo can take the spot, the Cruiserweight tournament winner can take the spot, etc...

 

Definitely not.
It will lock him in just behind 1. Ward 2. Canelo/Golovkin winner though.

 

but but but he UD burns don't you know?

 

No. Indongo is not a pfp fighter.

 

no but if he beats him and then Garcia . then goes uup to 147... and beats Thurman,spence . I would say you would hhave to put him#1 them.

 

The winner of Canelo GG won't be pfp the best either. Reason: Many think that Canelo lost fights that he won. Some think that GG lost to Jacobs. I don't. It's a very good fight, but i won't rank either guy pfp the best only because of the drama surrounding their past fights. It doesn't have the feel of the winner being crowned pfp the best. But it's jmo.

 

People dont go around calling Crawford an ATG that no one wants to fight and strikes fear into any man who wears boxing gloves. Crawford aint up there with his trainer sayin stuff like "My guy can beat anyone at 154". Which is the equivalent of what Sanchez said when he said GGG could beat anyone at 175.

 

No. There's too many belts per division for that distinction to hold enough water. A fighter makes the belt worthy, not the other way around.

 

Yet they call him #1 or #2 P4P with that resume.

 

Did you ever think maybe they do that because Golovkin has been rated as such by doing about as much in a weak division?

 

Arguing over P4P lists.... might as well make a big deal out of an old "who's cuter" list you once made in high school...

 

Lance, who were the top 5 cutest male eskimos on your high school cute list?

 

Why, you looking for dates c0ckmaster?