This is what I've been told about Wilder so if you can help me out.

You haven't asked me to name top 10 fighters in any posts on the thread, you have me confused with someone else

 

Again you can't keep track of your own posts, I was in the process of responding to you before. I think you have me confused with someone else, you've never asked me to name top 10 HW's in any posts on this thread.

Show me where you asked me to name them.

 

OK, please do so. I'm asking now. My apologies.

Quite frankly, I assume(d) you are a Rico alt because you happen to have EXACTLY the same avatar he used for years.

 

Name the top 10 mother****er or stfu.

 

Nope no Rico alt, I've been on this forum longer than you dude.

Back to the topic. I am sure both Parker and AJ are interested in the Wilder fight.

Parker has an enforced mandatory vs Hughie Fury, you know this, I know this, the boxing world knows this. The fight has been signed and they are fighting in Manchester in September.

Joshua has a contractual obligation to rematch Fury and then an enforced mandatory vs Pulev. Again everybody knows this.

These two guys are unavailable as of this moment, they are not in a position to fight Wilder. But what I do know is that when they are available they then take on credible opponents, they seek out challenges. Parker took the tough route to the top and whilst Joshua bought his title with money he made up for it by then challenging and beating the most dominant HW of the 21st century.

Neither AJ or Parker have a record of avoiding tough competition where as Wilder has a very questionable run of voluntaries, a run where better opponents were available and he chose not to go for them. This is why people are questioning why he is refusing to fight Whyte. The guy is a tough customer and is clearly bringing enough financial backing for someone like Wilder who's been earning less than a quarter purse than what Hearn is offering for Whyte.

You claim Hearn isn't interested in making AJ vs Wilder and I think this is completely wrong, he is definitely interested in making AJ vs Wilder for three reasons.

1. It's a relatively easy fight for AJ compared to Wlad or Fury
2. He brought Wilder over to the UK to cast the AJ/Wlad fight for Sky in order to introduce Wilder to the UK viewers in order to build up the fight
3. He is offering Wilder a chance to fight on a massive card in the UK headlining a PPV show vs Whyte which would in turn lead to more PPV buys for Joshua vs Wilder

Why bother going to all that if he wasn't interested in making the fight down the line?

Remember it's Wilder who generally being criticised for opponent choices, not Joshua or Parker.

I'll answer your list in the second part of the post for continuity.

I thought Whyte was ranked WBC #4, he's actually #5.

Talking about Stiverne this is where I feel you contract yourself slightly. You claim Parker and AJ are not intersted in making the Wilder fight choosing instead to meet their mandatories/contactural obligations butyet you then go on to say that:

"And Wilder has to fight Stiverne or a unification next unless Stiverne takes step-aside money (he has said he won't) or unless Wilder wants to give up the WBC title (don't be foolish)."

So you have one rule for Joshua and Parker but a different rule for Wilder? Contradiction?

I'm going to ignore the last part of the post as I think you were addressing someone else in confusion, happens.


My top 10 HW list is as follows in no particular order:

T-Fury
Joshua
Wlad
Ortiz
Parker
Pulev
H-Fury
Whyte/Chisora winner
Bellew/Haye winner

Maybe Browne or Jennings at 10. Hard to put Povetkin in the top 10 these days when nobody knows if he's clean or not.

That's my top 10 HW list.

 

Thats a pretty accurate list. It seems as though British Heavyweight are taking over the division

 

Saint, peep the bottom of the post.
Saint, he copied and pasted this old pathetic answer, lmao. Whyte/Chisora winner, Bellew/Haye winner, and no Wilder. I remember this sorry **** lol... You may be the worst poster alive!

 

No, they are likely to have rematches as both fights had their controversy. I wouldn't expect someone as small minded as you to understand that.

You have already been stumped many times in this thread and yet all you can come back with is "Get Wilder to fight Joshua".

Broken drum.

 

You are absolutely the worst poster ever, lmao. Thee worst. Go crawl back under your alt loser.

 

Join Date:
Jun 25, 2013

I was here before alts and trolls were even a thing, before the days of facebook.

Once again you can't respond to a post I've made. You are easy pickings, just ask @UnleashtheFURY or @latineg

Amazing how you can be a dentist (if you really are) when you struggle to put together basic sentences.

 

Regardless when Tyson Fury comes back hes gonna smash all these guys to be honest.

An an in shape, well prepared Tyson Fury that schooled Klitschko every round no current Heavyweight stands a chance against.

Fury would expose how stiff and poor of a mover Joshua is. And Fury would make Wilder look a fool missing by miles with his wild shots.

 

I was really hoping to discuss Wilder's hand size. Major disappointment.

 

What a stupid ****en post, lmao. Lmmfao...

 

One again another quality Blizzy reply.

I could quote a myriad of your posts and say the same thing, except it would be true.

 

You posted an old post and forgot to edit it. That makes you a phony ass fool. And you know that I know which makes it worse, lmao. ****en dumbass lol...