Punch count scoreboard: yay or nay

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Glass City Cobra, Jul 4, 2017.


  1. scorecard12

    scorecard12 Member banned Full Member

    357
    96
    Jul 4, 2017
    I know it takes the Drama out of the fight but I like open scoring.
     
  2. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,063
    3,646
    Jun 30, 2005
    No.

    Punchstats are already taken too seriously as it is. It doesn't show the difference between a hard flush shot and grazing one that lands, and more importantly, it's subject to human error anyway.

    People put way way too much stock on it. Jim Lampley probably has some to blame for that because he always brings it up like it means something important. It doesn't.
     
  3. maguswarlock

    maguswarlock Active Member Full Member

    1,024
    25
    May 6, 2015
    compubox style punch counts is worthless but a video analysis followed by a punch count would be nice.. the analysis would show the more meaningful shots, can tell how significant a punch is by the way it landed - the deformation caused on glove/opponent - the reaction caused on opponent - possiblly even use audio indicating how well a punch landed.

    maybe even give boxing gloves with sensors on it a chance

    http://www.popularmechanics.com/adventure/sports/a14919/boxing-gloves-sensors-data/

    you get a recording of every punch that landed significantly then compare that to video feed to know where that significant punch landed. if it landed in the scoring zone then count it.
     
  4. lucky luke

    lucky luke Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,622
    901
    May 18, 2013
    This has been tried in the amateur boxing. Didn't stop the coruption.
     
  5. tealt

    tealt Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,217
    4,198
    Mar 24, 2017
    So what happens when people start complaining about the person who decides that the punch didn't land significantly? Everyone thought when the NFL put in instant replay that controversy would be over. Its not. Unless someone develops and Artificial intelligence computer that judges fights the same way boxing will always have controversy. If you poll 100 pac fans who say he was robbed and asked them which rounds he in fact won you would get very little consensus on which rounds he won except for the 9th round.
     
  6. tealt

    tealt Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,217
    4,198
    Mar 24, 2017
    I 100 percent agree with this. The more sampling you have the less error you have. Maybe 7 judges for championship fights. Throw out the outliers that are more than 2 rounds from main sample and just do aggregate scoring. This way the judges might be more keen to not having their card thrown out. Give a small bonus for not getting you card thrown out. If you get too many in a row or within a time frame you get suspended.
     
  7. Gil Gonzalez

    Gil Gonzalez Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,607
    2,862
    Jun 15, 2012
    I like my idea better. Every fight is scored by a priest, a rabbi and an imam.
     
    mirkofilipovic likes this.
  8. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,098
    Jul 19, 2004
    Instant replay is badly needed. After a robbery the judges should be shown the fight in slow motion and explain to everyone why they scored the fight the way they did, judges should be suspended for life, new ones trained, same with referees and boxing commissions, boxing needs to be investigated again...............