What does this say about Floyd's win over Pac?

Damn that hurt! lol Just because I don't agree with you and that dummy Gannicus doesn't make me a poor poster. I have my opinion and you have yours. Sorry if I don't agree with all the off the wall stuff you post on here but every once in a while you do make a post that makes a little sense. I give you that.

 

You clearly a troll if this question has some profound meaning for you. we all know Pac only fought david diaz at 135, so why do you keep asking that question as if it has some great meaning? We both know why, you think it dictates Pac at 135, and therefore is not "sold" at 135. Use your brain FFS...

 

Duh! Don't get upset, Homer. We are just exchanging opinions on here. All this stuff is hypothetical. I'm not ready to make the leap that Pac would destroy a prime JLC at 135 based on his one fight at that weight. If you are, then good for you.

 

Upset? There's nothing to get upset about, so relax lil one.
Pac has destroyed better fighters than JLC. Bigger, stronger, faster, better fighters than JLC. If all you have to make your decision is "He only fought david diaz", then I guess you don't know how to apply knowledge.

 

Not at 135 though.

 

No sh*t sherlock. Thanks for confirming you have no ability to apply knowledge. You're a waste of time with the utter simplicity of your style.

 

Well quit wasting your time and mine. Have a good day, sir. lol

 

Learn to apply your knowledge son...

 

What does it say that pac fought Floyd after looking bad against Maidana twice? Dont say that Mayweathers style dorsnt depend on speed either because one of his main weaponsz the pull counter, is all about speed

 

It says that Maidana was an ultimate stylistic threat to Mayweather and Mayweather did what he had to do. Just immediately before that he pulled out one of the best performances of all time against Canelo (who was majorly stylistically disadvantaged himself, against Mayweather) - thus emphasises the significance of styles matchups.

 

They busy twisting floyds quotes "rich coward" when its very clear he is stating hed happily be called a coward and not fight pac if he wont submit to BOTH fighters being randomly drug tested

 

As a may fan id say speed matters very little. Floyd punches off his man mid combo to interupt their rythem. Its all about timing.

My trainer is like pushin 40. Nice dad gut going on. Im much faster then him but he can tag me something viciously because he sees me coming and times me. You will often hear fighters talk about how overated fast punches are (spence recently said hed happily trade off alot of his speed for better timing)

 

Maidana fought very very similiar to jesus chavez who floyd did MUCH better against and to a lesser extent the cotto fight was similiar.

Against chavez may looked incredible against a style of fight its hard to look that good against

Then came cotto. Floyd still looked good against a higher rated fighter in cotto but was showing clear signs of slowing down with age

Then came maidana who floyd had way to much trouble with considering it was supposed to be a blowout (i think maidana was paying more.for a win v floyd then mcgregor)

 

Pac won less rounds against May than against Horn.

 

So Manny on a 3 win streak meets Floyd and gets completely outboxed.

So, when did you consider him done? After he wiped the floor with Aligeri? After beating Bradley and Rios? When? Floyd fought Pacman right after he had a really good showing against Aligeri. Why on earth would anyone believe Floyd waited for Manny to show signs of slippage when Manny put a beatdown the last 3 fighters he fought?

Ya'll are just hatin'. Floyd beat a Manny that was still considered very dangerous. And if you want to say it was after getting OKed by JMM, then explain the winning before and after fighting Floyd.