If Deontay Wilder is this bum who only beats cans and windmills his shots then how come

Personally I don't see him stepping up, unless it's AJ. However, if he's being genuine with calling out AJ, Parker, Wlad, Ortiz etc (he called them out recently in one of his many videos) then one can only assume that if AJ and Parker are tied up for at least the next 3 fights, then Wilder himself will have to take on a serious fighter. He's also just turned down Whyte, basically saying that he's not on the level.

My point being that it isn't leaving him with too many options other than an Ortiz or a Povekin. It will be fun to watch it unfold, or not unfold as might be the case.

 

If we're bending words then a lie is only a lie if you know it's false. Otherwise you're just wrong.

 

I also hope Blizzy doesnt get banned. Despite me thinking alot of what you say is nonsense (and you think the same with me), and on Wilder and Joshua it is plainly obvious we just dont agree, places like this would be boring without debate on both sides and there has been some more sensible aspects to these debates recently. On other fighters and subjects though i cant deny i find myself agreeing with a lot of it, and we both seem to like Josh Taylor so its all good. Depsite being a "F*cken alt brit who **** gobbles Joshua" in Blizzys eyes i actually quite like him and the fact he isnt swayed by the majority opinion, sticks to his guns, gotta respect that. Long live the @BlizzyBlizz

 

Wilder can ask whatever he likes, Hearn has explained the situation with AJ's next fight, they asked for an exemption because they have a rematch clause with Klitschko, they were given permission to fight WK (assuming he takes up the rematch option) but if he declines they have to fight Pulev or get stripped, so AJ can't fight anybody else or he loses the belt.

After WK or Pulev I'm guessing AJ is free to fight whoever. It's one fight, it's either or, it's not as if Joshua has ruled out Wilder for 3-4 fights, it's one fight and as you said Wilder has a mandatory to fight himself.

Also, you're right BOTH chose the latter, they both want to keep their belts and fulfill mandatory/rematch obligations, so why are you on here slaughtering just Joshua?

 

Exactly. Fighting Whyte would be perfect for him. He would get lots of money (far more than what he has ever gotten for a fight), and he would become better known by the British public. This will make setting up a fight with Anthony Joshua easier, and sales for the fight will increase because he has become better exposed to the public. As a belt holder he must surely be able to beat Whyte (who isn't world level) otherwise he doesn't deserve to be one. Him not taking the fight says a lot about his and his team's confidence in him.

 

You were just told why he fought 5 voluntaries in a row. I couldn't care if its a fact , there's a reason why its a fact.

And Arroela and Adamek were NOT mandatory's , they were voluntaries.

Vitali fought Adamek late in 2011. This was the WBC top 10 in 2011 before Vitali fought Adamek

RATINGS - WBC - Heavyweight - August 2011
World Title
VitaliKlitschko

1 Chris Arreola

2Alexandr Dimitrenko

3 Bermane Stiverne

4Denis Boytsov

5 Johnathon Banks

6 Chauncy Welliver

7 Tyson Fury

8Robert Helenius

9 Mariusz Wach

10 Tomasz Adamek




Adamek was never his #1 contender. That fight was such a joke i didn't even bother watching it. YOU are the liar. maggot.

 

Adamek was actually counted as a Mandatory by the WBC I will let you research and figure out why. And you just linked rankings from 2009 and told me they were from 2011 yet another lie. You are so clueless. Wilder has yet to fight a Mandatory or a #1 contender. Klitschko did both. Sorry.

 

That was a typo from having multiple pages up at the time , i now rectified it. Adamek was neither a mando nor was he the #1 challenger. He was a cherry picked voluntary defense.
Vitali avoided 50% of his mandatory challengers over his career but you have no problem with that.
You , like the Snake are a despicable LIAR because facts get in the way of your agenda. I never lie. Never.
Lying is for the mentally weak like you.

 

Stiverne is the WBCs #1 contender. Wilder already beat him. Your disgraceful lies are exposed once again.

 

LOL he hasn't fought a #1 contender since being champion instead he has faced 5 handpicked bums for voluntary defenses. Wilder in almost 10 years and 40 fights has only fought one top 10 opponent period. That is how bad his resume is. I guess if he rematches Stiverne he can change that but not until that happens last we heard he is trying to pay Stiverne step aside money.

 

He was a mandatory you need to do your research. The only liar is you. I don't care if you argue your opinion that is what message forums are for but you continually lie. It needs to stop.

 

Prove he was a mando? How dafop could he be mando when he was ranked #10?? You need to quit lying because i'll call you out on it. Nobody likes a liar.

 

Fighting Adamek satisfied Vitali's mandatory defense according to the WBC. Go find the reason why it is easily available. You have been caught in so many lies on here it is impossible to keep track.

 

Wilder fought 5 voluntaries,there is no bending that.

 

Adamek held IBF and WBO trinkets , he was always an IBF guy , he had no major ranking nor did he beat any WBC ranked contender when he suddenly became a 'mandatory'.

When he fought Arroela in 2010 IBF and WBO international titles were on the line. After that loss Arroela entered the WBC rankings .

What your basically saying is the WBC just made Vitali vs Adamek a mandatory fight because it was such a cherry picked farce of a defense.. Vitali had 30 lbs and 6 inches in height over Adamek.

Fighting Stiverne next will satisfy the WBCs mandatory obligation. If it was ok for Vitali , its ok for Wilder according to you.