Paying to see somebody lose

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by lefthook82, Jul 14, 2017.


  1. lefthook82

    lefthook82 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,666
    753
    May 1, 2009
    I have long questioned this notion. I watched plenty of fights hoping somebody gets battered/schooled but actually paying for the privilege of that. Aside from Vitali v Williams (I paid to see Williams lose) I can't think of any fight I have done that for. It's an often used phrased for some of boxing's most controversial characters but I was just wondering how much truth there is it as far as the forum is concerned.

    Have any of you bought PPV/event tickets just to see a particular fighter lose?
     
  2. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,012
    Dec 27, 2010
    Betcha lotsa folk will be paying ITV ppv to see Selby lose tonight.
     
  3. Bax183

    Bax183 Member Full Member

    281
    183
    May 21, 2017
    At £16.95 I'm not. Not a chance. I know fans stateside say it's a good price compared to what they pay, and that is true, but this is nowhere near a PPV card. I hope "lotsa" fans stay away from this tonight.
     
  4. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,012
    Dec 27, 2010
    Of course I agree. Total rip off.really hope it backfires badly for ITV so they don't try this again!
     
    Bax183 likes this.
  5. boxingcrazy

    boxingcrazy Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,239
    52
    Jul 3, 2010
    you're hoping he loses so it means that the great carl Frampton can dodge the slick Selby bullet :thumbsup:
     
  6. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,012
    Dec 27, 2010
    Well done. That IS one of the reasons I want selby to lose. He is freakishly long and rangy and fast ...all wrong for short stubby Carl.
    I don't think selby is a good boxer...just that he capitalises on freakish physical advantages....


    I don't believe Carl is a real modern featherweight...he is too short and small, short reach etc....plus he doesn't have the high work rate and Bob n weave buzz saw style needed to overcome his physical disadvantages against today's huge tall long featherweights.

    Carl is basically a long range boxer trapped in a short stubby body. His skills and talents have allowed him to overcome this ...up to 122. But 126 is a step too far for Carl.

    The numbers tell the story. He lost zero fights at 122.... He's lost half the fights he's had at 126.
    Carl should stay at 122.
     
    Last edited: Jul 15, 2017
    im sparticus and CutThroatFade like this.
  7. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,589
    Apr 13, 2014
    LOL, he may suddenly go back down to 122 now that Rigo is moving to 126.
     
  8. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,012
    Dec 27, 2010
    He is even smaller than Carl. He is also too small for 126. He should move to 118.
     
  9. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,589
    Apr 13, 2014
    I'm in agreement, he could fight Inoue but his skillset means, imo that he will be able to hang at 126.

    I was lauding more to the fact how Frampton avoided him.
     
  10. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,012
    Dec 27, 2010
    It's professional sports...risk:reward etc etc
     
  11. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,589
    Apr 13, 2014
    It's not just Frampton who acted the coward, Quigg and LSC are just as bad.

    Tbh I don't think Frampton will be much longer, he'll take another L and be done within 24 months.
     
  12. sjp17

    sjp17 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,971
    1,252
    Apr 22, 2011
    I used to tune in to watch Eubank SR get beat and towards the end I was hoping he would win same with Tyson I was never a Tyson fan and I always wanted him to lose and towards the end hoped for him to win, just like Vlad vs big chin Josh ! still pissed he never finished him off when he had the chance !
     
    Liverpool82 and Here's Johnny like this.
  13. Liverpool82

    Liverpool82 Member Full Member

    288
    30
    Nov 16, 2010
    Out of curiosity why did you want to see Williams lose ? The attention he got after Tyson win or other ?
     
  14. Matt Petley

    Matt Petley Active Member Full Member

    945
    369
    May 19, 2017
    why did you want wlad to beat aj?
     
  15. PaddyGarcia

    PaddyGarcia Trivial Annoyance Gold Medalist Full Member

    16,188
    13,233
    Feb 13, 2014
    Not quite the same, but I routinely bet on Paul Smith so it feels like money well spent whenever he loses.