Tom Sharkey v Ron Lyle

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, Jul 15, 2017.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,127
    45,408
    Feb 11, 2005
    Super specimen Tom Sharkey, who went 25 rounds with the White Heavyweight Champ Jeffries, squares off with the Ronny Lyle of 1975, who just racked up two losses and surely lacks championship mettle.

    How many rounds does poor Lyle last under the relentless assault of the fantastic fighting machine? Does Sharkey go on to beat Ali a fortnight later? Foreman, too?
     
    richdanahuff likes this.
  2. Pugilist_Spec

    Pugilist_Spec Hands Of Stone Full Member

    4,937
    786
    Aug 17, 2015
    Some things never change.
     
  3. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,127
    45,408
    Feb 11, 2005
    Agreed. Sharkey's competitive excellence transcends generations.
     
  4. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,535
    Apr 26, 2015
    Since there is no real film of Sharkey in action (aside from his bout with Jeffries which is close to unwatchable) the question is unanswerable. However we do know experts from his time rated Sharkey very highly. Very tough, very durable, extremely well conditioned. Lyle was also a great contender from the 70's with his major issue being stamina and being relatively easy to outbox.
     
  5. richdanahuff

    richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,469
    13,006
    Oct 12, 2013
    This content is protected
     
    Pat M likes this.
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,526
    27,111
    Feb 15, 2006
    Lyle is all wrong for Sharkey.
     
  7. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,179
    15,178
    Jun 9, 2007
    Lyle by beat half to death
     
  8. BlackPanther(Comics)

    BlackPanther(Comics) Member banned Full Member

    187
    73
    Jun 17, 2017
    Ron Lyle = 6'3 220 pound modern heavyweight. Tom Sharkey = 170 to 180 pound fighter. I would have to go with Jack Sharkey. You know because even though their are weight classes for a reason, it doesn't matter when you put a fighter from back in the day against a modern sized fighter. Like for example even though Gene Tunney was a 6'0 170 pound fighter he would knock out Wladimr Klistchko the 6'6 240 pound fighter in one round. You know because he boxed back in the day. Rocky Marciano the 5'10 180 pound fighter who couldn't even beat 170 to 180 pound guys like Ted Lowry and Roland LaStarza would destroy 6'3 230 pound George Foreman and 6'5 240 pound Lennox Lewis because you know, he fought back in the day.
     
    Last edited: Jul 17, 2017
    Seamus and SHADAPBLAD like this.
  9. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Tom Sharkey*
     
  10. richdanahuff

    richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,469
    13,006
    Oct 12, 2013
    This content is protected
     
  11. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,535
    Apr 26, 2015
    Tunney was a 190 pound hwt without Roids.

    Today's slow moving hwts without Roids would look very different in Tunneys or Sharkeys day. Tall and lanky.
     
  12. richdanahuff

    richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,469
    13,006
    Oct 12, 2013
    This content is protected
     
    BlackPanther(Comics) likes this.
  13. JackSilver

    JackSilver Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,039
    4,860
    Jun 24, 2017
    Vitali looks far more natural than Wlad yet it was Vitali who was busted for roids before one of the Olympic Games so you can't totally tell just by looks.
     
  14. richdanahuff

    richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,469
    13,006
    Oct 12, 2013
    This content is protected
     
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,700
    21,316
    Sep 15, 2009
    Not seen enough footage of Sharkey so can't really say.