Garcia too good for Broner. Kovalev was cheated two times by the judges, then by the referee which appeared to be owned by Roc Nation, SOB always has a way to cheat..........
Broner's skills and should-be style is flash, athletic, quick, explosive... yet he truly fights like an old man. Predicting Maidana to defeat Broner back then when Broner was big time is one of my finer picks I'm more proud of while on this forum and it was because he fights like a lazy old man flat footed all of the time. He has had a couple exceptions and that came with size, but even against Rees we could see it coming. The problem with his shell is that it's static. His head movement is not to par with his other skills and style and is far too predictable. How many times is he going to duck down to his right into one of Maidana/Mikey's hooks? Ridiculous. Where does Broner go from here? It seems apparent from the post-Maidana and post-Porter trends that he will fight a few fights, against a couple tune ups and a lower ranked guy, maybe even pick up a vacant belt or weak titlist if one emerges, before stepping up for another "big fight" against a top 5 guy. He is still a notable name to face and defeat for anybody, really, so I don't have a problem with it. But he won't be beating any top 5 ranked fighters. DeMarco at 135 was the one and only there. Usually Broner is in fun fights to watch. Not this time with Mikey.
AB would rather lose not get chino'd again than give himself even a chance to win. Disgusting, long as he gets paid he don't ****ing care. FU to us fans. Tried claiming he tee new fmj, could anyone ever see fmj in the ring accepting the loss and just making sure he don't get ko'd
I loved hearing AB trash talk at the end of the night. He cracks me the FK up....Stay real AB ( he is an idiot)
He really should've been a swarmer/pressure fighter given his attributes, but that involves not being as active in the ring as old Toney lol
@Pimp C You see this thread? You've been on this forum for 13 years, your entire life revolves around this site, it's clouded your mind and ability to understand people. You cannot believe someone would be confident in a boxer, put money up, and then come back and admit they were wrong. You can't fathom it because you're an insecure girl who IS the type to not man up and say you were wrong. So stop all this ho(e) sh*t about 'ALT ACCOUNT'. If Horn loses (which he won't) ill be more than happy to say I was wrong. But you wont, because you're insecure and are afraid of the anonymous web. I come and go because I have a LIFE. I come here to chop it up over big fights that mean a lot to me. I don't need to be on here talking about undercards on free espn events. I have friends in real life to do that with. You were so sure that I would never in a million years admit to being wrong if horn lost Here's proof I've done it before and I'd do it again.
The phoney baloney manner in which you make your predictions is what makes you look like a fool. '"I 100% guarntee Broner wins." "Everybody do yourself a favor and bet on him, then go buy something nice..." "This is unfathomable how many people have Mikey winning." But the one you did get right... "I don't know **** about boxing." Now, combine this terrible post with your Jeff Horn spamming.... you're essentially a troll.
Crawford vs Horn would barely be acceptable as a tune up had Horn not been allowed to foul Pac with impunity. Its basically like Pacquiao vs David Diaz.