Video evidence of the LEGAL body shots that destroyed Kovalev

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IKSAB, Jul 26, 2017.


  1. joeyp130

    joeyp130 Active Member Full Member

    927
    247
    Dec 15, 2013
    It appears there is no argument that the last punch was in fact low. Whether it hit him in the nuts is not the point. It was very low and in my opinion an illegal punch.

    It's in that thought that I believe the ref failed. A fight should not end due to an illegal punch. The fight should be made an NC.

    Was Kovalev hurt, yes. Had Ward taken control of the fight that round, yes. But the ref should never wave off a fight after a punch that low.

    Also I will say that I've watched it several time and it doesn't appear other punches would be what I would call illegal shots. They were Borderline at best.

    As far as Kovalev being bent over for the last punch..it just seems to me that the trunks naturally hang even lower when bent over in that way. So in fact the capital B could have very well have been over his cup.
     
    TheyDontBoxNoMore7 likes this.
  2. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    The illegal low blow was low, the video and pictures prove it. Low blows are illegal in boxing, but not for SOB. SOB beat Kessler with elbows, low blows, holding, headbutting, SOB ran across the ring and used an intentional head butt, but SOB's personal referee called the fight a TKO because of an illegal head butt, even the commentators said it was intentional. SOB should have been disqualified. SOB is a damned cheat. HBO lost their arse on SOB, serves them right.......
     
    Maxime likes this.
  3. shanahan14

    shanahan14 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,488
    731
    Jul 5, 2011
    That's fine if you want to address them.

    I am not talking about any other punches. I am specifically saying the last punch was low, period. The fight was stopped due to the last punch. It should have been a recovery period for Kovalev. I don't care who is a fan of either fighter, that was incompetence by Weeks.
     
  4. Braindamage

    Braindamage Baby Face Beast Full Member

    11,039
    10,091
    Oct 1, 2011
    That's my point. I think the last punch is in fact questionable, but given the fact that Kov was bent over and Wards punch was on an upward trajectory, it may have been too close to call one way or the other. That being said, the NSAC may have felt they could not over turn Weeks decision with the evidence provided. I still believe Weeks should have given a count because Kov did lean into the ropes. But, again, Ward threw 20+ unanswered punches. 20 unanswered punches when a fighter is noticeably hurt, usually prompts a stoppage anyway. So one can argue the fight could have been stopped before the questionable blow was landed.
     
  5. joeyp130

    joeyp130 Active Member Full Member

    927
    247
    Dec 15, 2013
    20 unanswered punches?? Are you sure of that?
    I recall the last sequence as Ward forcing Kov to the ropes, Kov throws 2 as Ward comes in, the Ward throws 2 to the body then the fight was called. I'll have to rewatch.
     
  6. The Kentucky Cobra

    The Kentucky Cobra Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,576
    2,517
    Jan 9, 2017
    This is factually so very wrong. Again, those in favor of the stoppage have to completely disregard the reality of the footage and write fiction.
     
    lepinthehood and mirkofilipovic like this.
  7. The Kentucky Cobra

    The Kentucky Cobra Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,576
    2,517
    Jan 9, 2017
    More fiction from the Ward side of the argument. Kovalev never stopped throwing punches.
     
  8. C.J.

    C.J. Boxings Living Legend revered & respected by all Full Member

    46,772
    15,893
    Apr 14, 2009
    I'd like to ask Tony Weekes one question .....
    How wide is the beltline in his estimation ????
    The Marquis of Queensbury's rules clearly state...
    Any punch landing below the navel shall be deemed LOW & therefore a FOUL. Sp Ward's punches were FOULS !!!!!!!!!!!
     
  9. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    They video and still pictures proved that Weeks was a cheating liar! Those blows were low, it is clear...................the haters need glasses or they are just plain liars, they see what they want to see. A low blow is a low blow. Let's have the fight in Moscow with Russian Referee, judges, boxing commission, bet SOB would never allow such. When SOB said that neutral judges would be unfair, he told on himself. HBO lost, glad to hear that, Let HBO put all their money in a cheater who fans do not want to watch cheat................
     
  10. Radrook

    Radrook Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,923
    917
    Feb 24, 2017
    The problem is that despite the punch hitting the lettering they still claim it wasn't low. So pointing out that the punch is hitting the lettering will get you nowhere.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invincible_ignorance_fallacy
     
    The Kentucky Cobra likes this.
  11. Radrook

    Radrook Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,923
    917
    Feb 24, 2017
    :risas3:
     
    mirkofilipovic likes this.
  12. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    The letter was way below the belt and the navel/belly button, they are supposed to go by the rules..................
     
    iii likes this.
  13. Sinew

    Sinew The Assassin Full Member

    5,125
    191
    Feb 7, 2005
    Why is Kovalev' s belt all the way up to lats? Seriously they are an inch away.
     
  14. IKSAB

    IKSAB Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    4,411
    1,180
    Nov 29, 2014
    Exactly why Weeks declared the beltline a perfectly legal area to target. Those trunks were ridiculously high.
     
  15. The Kentucky Cobra

    The Kentucky Cobra Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,576
    2,517
    Jan 9, 2017
    Your lats end at your butt, well below your navel line. His trunks were on his navel line where they should have been, though they occasionally slid down.

    http://www.askthetrainer.com/image-files/best-back-exercise-chart.jpg

    Where did you expect him to wear his trunks...below his knees? If you aren't wearing your shorts up to your lats, you are showing ass like a prison *****.

    These are unusually high shorts. The entire abdominal region unfairly covered.

    https://i.ytimg.com/vi/l8fiAkL6s-Y/hqdefault.jpg
     
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2017