You can believe in unicorns if you want you rat. We won't know how good Wilder is until he can get the balls to step in with the best. Which he hadn't come close to doing even after nearly 40 fights, what a joke he is, makes sense that you would defend him.
Why would Joshua drop the IBF that he's just won to exchange it for another belt? Why not just defend it now, then fight Wilder after the mando is taken care off and potentially end up with 3 belts?
You have a point. Wilder and his WBC belt are not going anywhere, he won't lose it to Stiverne in the interim, so why drop the IBF and the WBA to just win the WBC when he can keep one belt and still unify with Wilder later on down the road.
Exactly. Joshua drops the IBF, Pulev fights some nobody for the vacant title. Joshua potentially wins the WBC off Wilder then has to circle back round to fight Pulev anyway to win the IBF back.
You have to be joking... Pot, kettle comes to mind... When i first started posting on here I actually took you seriously. Now i'm convinced you just a high level troll! I don't mind Wilder personally as a fighter, he is a dangerous fighter... but instead of talking nonsense he needs to step up and live up to his words. The arguement of who deserves what is a mute one really... since 90% of boxers challenging or are champions you could argue didnt deserve their position. But you cant argue with what they do when they get there. AJ didnt DESERVE his shot against Martin but he has lived up to it by taking on and beating klitschko.
Look up the meaning of hypocrite. Also look up the meaning of the phrase "Pot calling the kettle black"
Call his bluff you mean?that would be fair enough if he never had mandatories but as you can see in the article he has,you not think Wilder knows this? For someone fighting Ortiz next he's not said a peep about him