Michael Spinks asked how he'd beat Bob Foster

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by superman1986, Aug 5, 2017.


  1. superman1986

    superman1986 Active Member banned Full Member

    747
    383
    Jul 4, 2017
    This content is protected


    I'd lean towards Michael Spinks to win this one. Both had great power but Spinks IMO was the better boxer.
     
    BUDW, Rock0052 and Birmingham like this.
  2. The Funny Man 7

    The Funny Man 7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,867
    2,042
    Apr 1, 2005
    How do you think a match between Foster and Spinks' nemesis, Eddie Mustafa Muhammad, would have played out?

    On one hand Foster ran through everyone at 175, but on the other, Eddie's durability, mobility, and deceiving combination of hand speed and power would make for a fascinating clash.

    I was rematching some tape of Foster just recently, and I was surprised and impressed by Foster's ring generalship on offense. Everyone focuses on his breathtaking power, but his cunning in setting up that power was something I had always previously overlooked.
     
  3. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,527
    Apr 26, 2015
    Always loved Michael. Great fighter. He certainly had the skills and punch to beat anyone at lt Hwt. I still think the left uppercut he threw to beat Johnson was one of the best shots if not the best I've ever seen. Perfect thrown and devastatingly powerful.
     
    Rock0052, TBI, Clinton and 1 other person like this.
  4. slender4

    slender4 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,959
    2,031
    Apr 26, 2006
    I'm from Albuquerque, I knew Bob Foster and talked boxing with hom on a few occasions, but Spinks was better.
     
    superman1986 likes this.
  5. Birmingham

    Birmingham Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,075
    6,786
    Jan 13, 2017
    What a gentleman..Like him even more after that.
     
  6. superman1986

    superman1986 Active Member banned Full Member

    747
    383
    Jul 4, 2017
    I read that he became a cop after he retired from boxing and he retired as a police sergeant from the force.
     
  7. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,094
    80,138
    Aug 21, 2012
    Classy looking fellow.
     
  8. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,572
    43,878
    Apr 27, 2005
    I think it would be close. Years ago the consensus favored Foster. I've always thought it extremely close. Spinks and Foster would be two of the top 5 or so punchers ever at this weight i reckon. Both had murderous one punch knockout power in either hand. Spinks beat the better fighters.

    I wonder what strategy Eddie Futch would put in place for this one?

    Fosters jab would make it extremely awkward for Spinks and Foster's power makes it very hard to take too many risks.

    I'm thinking Spinks might have to stop him to win. Foster never had any problems durability wise at 175.
     
  9. Sangria

    Sangria You bleed like Mylee Full Member

    9,016
    3,815
    Nov 13, 2010
    SPINKS!!! Humble, polite and yet always giddy. Helluva guy.
     
    lloydturnip and Rock0052 like this.
  10. superman1986

    superman1986 Active Member banned Full Member

    747
    383
    Jul 4, 2017
    The same could be said for Spinks durability at LHW. Spinks seemed to have the better movement and quickness. Spinks seemed like a Walcott type mover

    Although at heavyweight, I'd in a minute pick Spinks to beat him. Some of the guys Foster lost to a heavyweight like Doug Jones and Ernie Terrell I think Spinks would have beaten.
     
    Last edited: Aug 5, 2017
  11. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,874
    Apr 30, 2006
    Foster's as dangerous as it gets at 175, but I'm a massive fan of Spinks there. I'd give him at least a solid chance to beat any 175 pounder ever.
     
    Reinhardt likes this.
  12. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,890
    18,844
    Oct 4, 2016
    Bob was a bad man at 175
     
    RockyJim likes this.
  13. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,957
    3,429
    Jun 30, 2005
    I think it's a 50/50 fight.

    They're the two best LHWs I've seen on film. All the footage I've seen of Charles is at HW and of Moore is when he was 40
     
  14. RockyJim

    RockyJim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,233
    2,420
    Mar 26, 2005
    Saw him live May 24,1969 in West Springfield Mass. when he KO'd Andy Kendall to retain his Lt. Heavy title...Foster was as good as it gets at 175 lbs.....
     
  15. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,527
    Apr 26, 2015
    The main technical flaw of Foster was dropping that jab. His jab was so good however no opponent at light hwt could capitalize. Spinks best punch is his right hand. Typically at a high level technical flaws are observed and a fight plan derived to attack those flaws. At some point Spinks finds Fostrrs jaw with a counter right and the fight is over. In an even bout Spinks stops Foster in round 9.
     
    superman1986 likes this.