Lomo should fight Corrales, then Berchelt...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by El Chicano, Aug 7, 2017.


  1. Reg

    Reg Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,389
    6,943
    Feb 5, 2016
    Rigo vs anyone around his weight sells less and is a less significant fight. Just say you don't like Loma and get it over with.
     
  2. pincai

    pincai The Indonesian Thin Man Full Member

    8,092
    10,552
    Jun 10, 2012
    Loma is so good even unification fight is deemed mismatch and unworthy.
    But I would really love to see him settle in one weight class, prove his dominance and carve a legacy before moving up for big money fight.
     
    khaosai galaxi likes this.
  3. coltaine

    coltaine Member Full Member

    209
    32
    Jun 12, 2015
    i'm not too bothered about corrales, but berchelt is low key legit to my mind, i see him having a very good career.
     
  4. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,592
    24,758
    Feb 19, 2007
    you should have started there, if youre such a fan of getting to the point. your butthurt over a perceived slight to loma, who i assume youre crushing on, does not equate to me not liking the man.
    ive been a fan of loma for a long time and have praised him on many posts, you would know that if you bothered to look at my post history before getting your panties in a bunch over something that isnt there.
     
  5. Reg

    Reg Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,389
    6,943
    Feb 5, 2016
    You're not one to point to post history after a misguided assumption like that. Rigondeux would school champions in his division in similar fashion to Lomachenko. The difference being Lomachenko would bring more fans and it makes a future bout with Garcia that much more significant. Those two factors alone defy your reasoning for wanting to see Rigondeaux over anyone around his division rather than Lomachenko against current titleholders. Wanting to see Rigo, who has nowhere to go with his career, over Lomachenko is fairly ignorant. Rigo, at best, can hope to get the champions at 126 in the ring with him but outside of GRJ they've proven to lack the drive to be great. That puts a dead halt on my interest in the 36 year old Cubans career. If you're thinking Rigondeaux has the size to challenge 130, you're wrong.
     
  6. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,592
    24,758
    Feb 19, 2007
    i would much rather watch rigo vs santa cruz, frampton, valdez, which would sell more than the fights youre talking about for loma, even yamanaka or magdaleno would be preferable. me preferring those fights over lomas fights at 130 doesnt make me a hater, it makes me more discerning in my entertainment choices.
     
  7. Reg

    Reg Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,389
    6,943
    Feb 5, 2016
    I'm just pointing out that your previously given reasons don't add up to reality. You can prefer Rigo's potential matches more all you want. But don't makeup some bs reasoning to justify it to other people. It also took an Opponent like Donaire for Rigondeaux to exceed the viewers that Lomachenko is getting. I don't think Rigo is going to be outdoing Lomachenko in that department just because he fights a Mexican fighter.
     
  8. yeyo monster

    yeyo monster Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,198
    937
    May 4, 2012
    Wont paid a cent for both fight!

    Pillow fisted corrales? For god sakes!
    Berchalt?

    Loma fans dare to said garcia brings no money to the table and they ask for this fights?

    Hipocrites! Shame shame shame!

    Rigo or garcia! Thats it
     
  9. SOUTHERMOST

    SOUTHERMOST Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,957
    217
    Oct 24, 2006
    Rigo got lots of option at 126 nothing to prove at 130 if Loma wants Rigo come down to 126 I think is fair to both.
     
  10. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,592
    24,758
    Feb 19, 2007
    wtf are you talkin about made up bs reasoning? aint nothing bs about what i wrote, or are YOU trying to tell ME what I prefer? idgaf if you think loma fighting psoriasis would sell more than any rigo fight, im still going to prefer every fight i mentioned to the 2 that youre looking forward to... and i would be willing to bet that a majority would see it like i do. i like loma a lot more than rigo, who i dont like at all, but im not going to jerk him off for every thing he does, thats fanboy nonsense.
     
  11. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,690
    Sep 8, 2010
    Berchelt
    Corrales
    Gervonta
    Salido II
    Rigondeaux

    ...if it isn't one of those, it won't be very relevant unless he moves up to 135, which I would kind of rather he not do. Beating 3 of the above 5 over the next 2 years would be a great start to matching the hype.
     
  12. yeyo monster

    yeyo monster Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,198
    937
    May 4, 2012
    Thats a 2 years fight schedule! So you want rigo , salido to fight Loma when they are old? They are old all ready! Why not garcia or rigo now? Even i will pay money to see Gervonta vs Loma! I think that will be a good fight
     
  13. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,690
    Sep 8, 2010
    It wasn't in order, it was just a list. I'm saying those are the only names really worthwhile at 130 for him. Ideally, we get Salido II next.
     
  14. CST80

    CST80 The Hesitant Nihilist Staff Member

    260,087
    263,938
    Nov 23, 2013
    Hanging around SFW and taking the scalps of Rigo, Berchelt, Corrales, Davis, Frampton, Valdez, Diaz, Santa Cruz, Warrington, Mares, Salido, Vargas, Lara, Machado, Marrero, Quigg, Galahad and Selby, that's the makings of a very impressive ATG resume, give a rest with all of your casual nonsense, wah wah wah Crawford, wah wah wah Garcia, most of you mother****ers would have been criticizing Mayweather and Pacquiao and telling them to not waste their time on Hernandez, Augustus, Corrales, Chavez, Castillo, Barrera, Solis, Morales and Marquez. After all, most of them had already been "exposed".:lol:
     
    UnleashtheFURY likes this.
  15. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh!

    74,773
    42,213
    Sep 29, 2012
    They wouldn't - we both know why. Same reason they fail to criticize Wilder or Stevenson.

    "I'm a HUGE Lomachenko fan...... BUT" Riiight! :lol:

    Give me a break.
     
    CST80 likes this.