In Their First 10 Pro Fights, Who's Been More Impressive? Vasyl or Floyd?

You both follow me around because I effect you. Like in this thread for example which triggered Unleash the bum. You guys are comparing a 30 year old to a 20 year old. It's pathetic so I just put everything in perspective. You guys don't even talk boxing. You just try to ridicule. I don't care what a couple of losers who always follow me around think.

Simple as that.

 

You deliberately try to confuse me with other posters so you can say something against me, but it doesn't work. I never compared Floyd's first 10 fights to Lomachenko's you muppet. I am not the thread starter. But since we are on this subject, a more plausibe comparison would be Rigondeaux. Rigo also turned pro late after winning 2 Olympic gold medals, but fought 10 bums in his first 10 pro fights, while Loma fought several champions (former or current) and contenders. Loma has the best resume for a boxer that only had 10 fights and it is not even close. Keep hating on him that is all you can do, race soldier.

And you don't effect me at all, you are a virtual punching bag for me.

 

Who accomplished more as a pro, by the time they were 29....Loma or Floyd?

 

lmao sure. You bums seek me out. I don't seek you out bottom line. You're both trash. Online doesn't correspond to much in the real world.

 

I don't remember Floyd taking an L in his first 10 pro fights...

 

lmao sure. You bums seek me out. I don't seek you out bottom line. You're both trash. Online doesn't correspond to much in the real world.

 

You don't seek us out, because you don't want to get owned in the debate, it is clear as day. You were very active in the longue until I destroyed you in one thread, since then you went MIA. You got also clowned lately in the RBR thread, so you started to ignore our posts and ducked our questions because you couldn't answer them. All you could do is calling me an idiot but you couldn't explain why you called me that, because you had no arguments to back up your claims. You are quite easily the worst poster here, an agenda driven spastic who knows jack **** about the sport. Even worse than the morons like Blizzyblizz or Nay_sayer. Even though they are also dumb and very biased, they know a (very) little about boxing, so they don't get owned all the time. You do.

 

What I said was the simple truth. It's not a dumb comment. You bundle of sticks can't handle reality. Let me know when Loma surpasses Floyd idiot.

 

Let me know when Floyd was on espn then moved to espn 2 lmao

 

Floyd never was as busted up as Loma was against Marriaga. Wtf is there even a debate about lmao

 

You never said anything that was remotely close to truth. Calling posters idiots after they own you in a debate is a ***** move, nothing more. Loma already surpassed Mayweather as an amateur, since Loma is arguably the best amateur of all time. Loma turned pro later so nobody can expect from him to fight in as many weight classes as Floyd did.

Loma never took a knee like Mayweather did against Hernandez. Loma was never knocked down like Mayweather was against Judah. lol don't you ever get tired of getting owned ?

 

Lomachenko's resume is better.

 

Loma will never hold Floyd's jock strap. He already has an L and a face more busted than Floyd had over the span of his career. Fact

 

There's no way Loma can possibly end up greater than Floyd. The question is, will Loma be able to even make Top 50 in terms of greatness.
Loma > Floyd H2H is what some of us are saying (but it's quite weak of an argument because Loma hasn't fought elites yet).

 

Floyd took a knee against a mediocre Carlos Hernandez, got knocked down by a mediocre Judah and lost to Castillo according to the majority of boxing fans, but hometown judges saved his ass. Fact