Harder puncher, Shavers or Foreman?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by VG_Addict, Aug 17, 2017.


  1. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,724
    3,931
    Jun 13, 2012
    Who do you think hit harder? I think Foreman's power is more proven against top opponents.
     
  2. It's Ovah

    It's Ovah I am very feel me good. Full Member

    14,876
    19,136
    Sep 5, 2016
    Foreman was more proven as you say, but then you have all the testimonies of people who fought them both who tend to side with Shavers. It's tough to say. If forced to answer I'd side with Foreman, who just looked like he hit guys with a lot more force, though Shavers was the faster and more explosive puncher, and tended to really get his body into shots.

    I'd consider Foreman a more dangerous fighter over the course of the fight, and Shavers the more dangerous in the early rounds. Both fighters didn't have the greatest stamina, but Foreman's strength still enabled him to hurt guys with slow or glancing shots, while Shavers's power badly dropped off if he didn't pace himself.
     
    Stevie G likes this.
  3. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,819
    6,568
    Dec 10, 2014
    Probably Foreman, since he stopped Lyle but Lyle took Earnie's best bombs.
     
  4. RockyJim

    RockyJim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,232
    2,418
    Mar 26, 2005
    Both had stamina problems...neither really carried their power into the later rounds...probably Foreman.
     
  5. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,724
    3,931
    Jun 13, 2012
    Foreman was an arm puncher. If he put his body into his punches, he might have killed someone.
     
  6. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,874
    Apr 30, 2006
  7. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,547
    43,803
    Apr 27, 2005
    Shavers is the harder hitter and Foreman the much better fighter. Every single common opponent, and there's plenty of them, named Shavers. Mostly without any doubt in their mind.
     
  8. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,501
    27,036
    Feb 15, 2006
    Shavers.

    The common opponent testimony is overwhelming.
     
  9. juppity

    juppity Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,342
    4,347
    Dec 28, 2016
    Watch for Leroy Caldwell view on the power of both at 1 min 30 secs.
    Common synopsis of common opponents that Shavers hit harder.
    Foreman had a better career because of imposing his size , physical strength ,
    better chin and boxing skills.
    This content is protected
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,501
    27,036
    Feb 15, 2006
    Exactly, and that is a new one for me!
     
  11. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,547
    43,803
    Apr 27, 2005
    It was put up in here weeks ago. It's a great clip.
     
  12. KernowWarrior

    KernowWarrior Bob Fitzsimmons much bigger brother. Full Member

    3,135
    3,451
    Jul 12, 2012
    Well call me a coward but i sure as hell would not want Shavers or Foreman hitting me on the whiskers, either one catching any boxer on a unprotected jaw would put that boxer in the land of nod for some ZZZZZZZZZZs
     
  13. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,527
    Apr 26, 2015
    I've watched both fighters train in the mid 70's. Based upon this I would say Foreman hit harder punch for punch.
     
  14. GoldenHulk

    GoldenHulk Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,597
    5,111
    Jan 7, 2007
    I've seen this thread a thousand times it seems. Shavers hit harder, Foreman was better in all other areas.
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,605
    28,858
    Jun 2, 2006
    Neither could hit like Primo Carnera ,he made guys see visions!