Terence Crawford Had The EASIEST PATH EVER To Becoming Undisputed Champion...

All roads lead to JMM with you. KTFO6 still has you shook. LOL

I do however agree with the thread premise.

 

Why did you pick Postol to beat him?

 

Everyone was saying Postol was going to whoop Crawford.

 

It doesn't change the fact that Pistol is a bum. Wishing for someone to win doesn't change their limitations so lets drop this nonsense about ''everyone was saying Postal would beat Crawford''

 

The main reason he has those belts is because of a size and reach advantage and that division is weak.










It's fun being able to throw that back in THEIR faces.

 

Not me: for Crawford vs Postol, I went Crawford UD in the prediction League, mainly because I have common sense and knew Crawford would have far too much for Postol.

 

As did I.

 

Your reply doesn't disprove the fact that most were saying Postol would win.

 

It's Crawford that's making it look easy. That's what p4p looks like. I guess many of you are brand new on this earth. This effort to take away credit away from a boxer who did what's he's supposed to do is really pathetic. Let's see Lomo try to do something like this and you'd say he's an ATG. Besides this unification makes it more likely for others to unify like Ward, but not if you full of **** savage heathens keep trying to take away credit.

 

You repeating the same tired old chestnut that ''everyone was backing Pistol to win' doesn't change the fact that Pistol is a C level fighter and not everyone thought he had a chance against Crawford.

 

Zab would have met the same fate as the rest of Crawford's victims.

 

Did you just start watching boxing in the last few years? It seems like it.

 

Then you don't know much about boxing. Hate if you want but if you can't recognize talent well.

 

What makes him a C level fighter?

 

I did not pick Postol to beat him. Why did you score Loma/Russell jr a draw, Ward over kovalev and Jacobs 10-2 over GGG, since we are on the subject of scoring fights?