Some perspective for those blowing smoke up Crawford's rear and calling him P4P

This content is protected

As you can see, some of these fights took place in basements and school gyms against complete novices. While we're meant to believe Indongo was a live credible foe who was going to be Crawford's toughest test, simply because he took out an old dog on it's last legs?

Indongo discovered last night that American boxing is at a entirely different level to the farmers he was used to fighting back in his village.

 

What Euro bums are these that you speak of?

 

Jacobs, Lemieux, Geale, Brook and Canelo are far from what I'd call novices.

 

Indongo was fed to Burns to make him look good, yet the cherry pick went wrong. Now Crawford does what Ricky was meant to do to him, he is now top p4p?

If Ricky had beaten Indongo the same way Crawford did last night, would you have him top 5 p4p? He has just as much reasons as Crawford.

 

I really don't. You'd be surprised at the amount of falsehoods that have been levelled my way, mistaking me for someone else who has put forward some moronic argument/point.

 

You can't respond because you have no retort to a simple question that puts you in a corner with your back against the wall.

Ricky is a three weight champion,(something which Crawford is yet to accomplish) yet I wouldn't dare call him p4p because he got his belts by beating bums.

When we break things down slowly, piece by piece we begin to see beyond the smoke and mirrors