Terence Crawford Had The EASIEST PATH EVER To Becoming Undisputed Champion...

I don't think anyone calls Lomo or Crawford bums... haven't read that before.

And I think if anyone cited them P4P #1, they would be seen by everybody as overrating them, especially Lomo.

Would be curious to see what Crawford's viewership ratings were. Wonder if he outdid Lomo. Crawford is far from a popular fighter, though. Doubt any more casuals watched his fight than Lomo's, almost certainly less since ESPN spent half the time and energy advertising it.

 

They were both unified titlists, damn right he gets a huge pass.

Hell I'll give every active title holder a pass if they all agree a unification fight in their next outing.

 

I already answered your question. He's a basic fighter with limited ring intelligence.. He fights like a wild animal with no sense of awareness.

 

Umm no. Even Sosa was better than indongo. GRJ and making walters quit are HUGE wins

 

Crawfords opponents have been so weak and soft, Crawford must think Boxing is easy.

He will get a wake up call when he goes to 147 and fights some men in their prime who actually know how to box.

 

Utterly false.

 

Gary Russell Jr who was ranked like 8, 9, or 10 (and even that was purely on "potential") and who has amassed one good victory over a ranked guy his whole career?

That's a "HUGE win" but Indongo is one that you are going to post about how sub-par he was? Get out of here, you're a joke or clearly sad about something Crawford did or said.

Sosa better than Indongo? Haha. Yeah. You a joke.

 

I'd wager 34 isn't even Indongo's real age. He's probably closer to 54

 

No, because people say it, don't make it true. The fact is that Postal was a champion and so was Indongo.

 

Yea man I don't know much about boxing cos I don't agree with you. Good one.

Never said he wasn't talented did I?

I can't see him being the top dog at 147 with Spence and Thurman around is all.

 

And because you say it doesn't make it true neither.

These aren't marquee names we're talking about.

Also the use of the word champion is loose.

Both names mentioned were title holders but during the same time as Crawford in the same division. If they were a champion does that mean Crawford wasn't?

And if all title holders are a champion then it really only means you're amongst the top 4 of the division.

What these were are the best possible men Crawford could face at the time he faced them. For that he deserves credit.

High risk, low reward. As I said.

 

He's no doubt older than 34.

 

Come on with the BS man, the fact is that they were champions and considered among the best in their division and anyway you cut it, it's a fact. Yeah, they were the best when he faced them and they proved that by being in the position they were. Nobody gave them those titles, they had to fight for them. They were not vacant titles, Postal took his title and Indongo took both of his titles. Crawford just happened to be the better champion and he showed that. No cakewalk and no easy ride. If he was less than what he was then he just could have easily lost.

 

What bs do I need to cut?

Judging by your response it is quite clear you've agreed with me word for word.

 

Couldn't hurt him but dropped him 2x lmfao