Some perspective for those blowing smoke up Crawford's rear and calling him P4P

How many times has Bumlovkin moved up in weight?

 

Gamboa, Postol and Indongo were established in the division. They might not be elite level but they were all established, that's undeniable. If all three of those met one another some of those would be close match-ups which could go either way. Bud is an elite level guy and made them all look poor, as he did to Burns.

 

If Bud never existed for example a potential matchup between Indongo and Postol would be a decent match-up. Just because both lost to an elite level fighter dosen't turn them **** overnight.

 

After Crawford destroys Horn you're going to look real stupid. Especially since you picked Horn to beat and expose him.

 

You sound like a racist mentioning farming communities, like everybody from Africa is living off the land. And no, I'm a fan of boxing and Wilder is not even in my top ten heavyweights at this time.

I have GGG as my P4P number one but can freely admit as an unbiased boxing fan Bud has a better resume when they was both at the same age of 29. Even during GGG's lack of opposition during that time he was still in most people's P4P list from his skill-set. Just how Bud is currently number 2 on my P4P list for his skill-set. If you want to attack Bud's resume, I'll gladly attack GGG's to prove resume dosen't mean ****.

 

A WBO Super-Featherweight titlist with two defenses turned WBO Lightweight titlist with 5 defenses was "working part-time in retail" training for the fight?!?

Damn, I thought Bob Arum was bad.

 

The fact of the matter is this, Bumlovkin spent YEARS beating up on TOMATO CANs @ 160 - while ignoring the challenge waiting for him @ 168.. The ONLY noteworthy 160lb'er on his resume is Jacobs - a guy he arguably lost to. Meanwhile, Crawford has beaten the BEST and become LINEAL in *two* weight classes.

Crawford >>> Bumlovkin

 

Weak arguments are when people throw presumptions around like "Oh, you sound like a Wilder fan" to try and justify their ulterior motives. You never disagreed with Bud's resume being better than GGG's aged 29 so my argument must be more than weak to you. You also never disagreed with GGG being on most people's P4P list during his time fighting relative bums in comparison to his own level of boxing skills. This is what Bud is going through at the moment.

As for future bouts, if M Garcia who is on most people's P4P list fought Bud at 140lbs, he'd lose quite convincingly. TC is a completely different animal to when he beat them in the amateurs. He wants to move up and fight the best at 147lbs, so that tells me he's after names on his resume, he's not being fed journeymen and holding the belts hostage. He's dropping his belts to fight the best. I'm a GGG fan but he never did this!

As for Burns' working P/T that's his own problem for spending his money and not saving it. If I was headlining shows in Scotland he'd have made over a million throughout his career. If he's not got any left, that's down to him being financially unstable and dosen't have anything to do with his boxing skills. Which are proven to be at World level already, seeing as he's been champion in different weight classes.

 

Gamboa and Postol were much more established than Geale ever was.

Exactly WHO has Daniel Geale ever beaten?

 

Bumlovkin hasn't beaten Canelo yet - so exactly HOW is his resume "far superior" to Crawford's? Please explain, Einstein...